Teams

LClarke (Jeff Adams)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-22vs KCochran (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesToni Laney vs Eryn Ratcliffe6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesLina Clarke vs Caroline Boger5-7, 3-6
2025-07-15vs NWillis (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesToni Laney vs Emerson Mitchell6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLina Clarke vs Allison Bumgardner6-3, 6-4
2025-07-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesLina Clarke vs Carlie Kerechanin6-0, 6-4
2025-07-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMeghan Bartholomew vs Claudia Bareis3-6, 5-7
2025-06-24Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLina Clarke vs Claudia Bareis4-6, 2-6
2025-06-24vs NWillis (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMeghan Bartholomew vs Ella Bumgardner6-2, 6-2
2025-06-17vs KRice (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesToni Laney vs Katharine Rice Maxey6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLina Clarke vs Megan Hunter6-1, 6-1
2025-06-09vs KRice (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMeghan Bartholomew vs Alexandria McNulty6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Meghan Bartholomew
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.58
Toni Laney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Lina Clarke
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
4.19
Hannah Chillag
published
4.17
Claudia Vizzini
published 4.5
4.01
Irma Laney
published
3.84
Hoa Tran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Laney + Irma Laney15069% games+10.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Meghan Bartholomew
66W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.59
4.5
Toni Laney
172W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.58
4.5
Lina Clarke
66W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Diana West
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Hannah Chillag
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
4.19
4.5
Claudia Vizzini
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Irma Laney
28W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Hoa Tran
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.