Teams

Atterbury

2022 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Womens 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-01vs CANIHANLost 01
L#1 DoublesAn Politi / Diana Rode vs Sonya Young / Katie Moore3-6, 6-7
2022-09-24vs Egger-NelsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAn Politi / Diana Rode vs Janet Waren / Carrie Perkis6-2, 6-4
2022-09-21vs CANIHANLost 01
L#3 DoublesAn Politi / Melissa Rahe vs Wesley Barker / Erin Gould0-6, 5-7
2022-08-22vs CANIHANLost 01
L#3 DoublesAn Politi / Diana Rode vs Catherine Morrison / Ashley Novak3-6, 3-6
2022-08-13vs Egger-NelsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Rode / An Politi vs Carrie Perkis / Barbara Caropolo6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Katrina Knight
published
4.07
Candy Pegram
published 4.5
4.04
Deborah Barefoot
published 4.5
3.95
Lisa Phelps
published
3.84
Lynn Felton
published
3.79
Stephanie Stevens
published
3.79
Melissa Rahe
published
3.77
Diana Rode
published 4
3.77
An Politi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Megan Atterbury
published
3.55
Angie Coats
published 4
3.50
Sharon Feiler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Stevens + Megan Atterbury6456% games+9.1% vs expected
Lynn Felton + An Politi9357% games+6.1% vs expected
Lynn Felton + Sharon Feiler4163% games+1.4% vs expected
Stephanie Stevens + Melissa Rahe224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Atterbury + Diana Rode303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katrina Knight
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Candy Pegram
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Deborah Barefoot
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
Lisa Phelps
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.95
Lynn Felton
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
Stephanie Stevens
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Melissa Rahe
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Diana Rode
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
An Politi
205W–127L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Megan Atterbury
18W–13L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Angie Coats
4W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sharon Feiler
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.