Teams

KJohnson (Sardis)

2023 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatherine Currier vs Jennifer Hamlin6-2, 7-6
2023-08-08vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKatherine Currier vs Cindy Rhoten2-6, 0-6
2023-07-18vs CLogar/RBostic (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 SinglesKatherine Currier vs Rachel Bostic6-1, 6-3
2023-06-29vs RAddison (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatherine Currier vs Belle Landzert3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-15Won 10
W#3 SinglesKatherine Currier vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Katie Crosby
published
3.61
Mary Laird Garrison
published
3.35
Emily Battle
published
Anne Wilson
published 3.5
3.10
Katie Ferry
published
3.05
Georgia Buck
published
2.80
Katherine Currier
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.63
Kate Johnson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Crosby
33W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.83
Mary Laird Garrison
33W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.61
Emily Battle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Anne Wilson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Ferry
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.10
Georgia Buck
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Katherine Currier
32W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
Kate Johnson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%18%82%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.