← Search

Kate Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 78W–51L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history129 matches
W
2026-09-25 · KTreece/EBass (Sardis) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erica Adcock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-22 · EBass/LThompson (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsay Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-15 · EBass/LThompson (Sardis) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Foley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-11 · KTreece/EBass (Sardis) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Georgia Buck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · EBass/LThompson (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Currier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · KTreece/EBass (Sardis) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Bass
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Carey championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-14 · KTreece/EBass (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Georgia Buck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-17 · EBass/ASpanjers (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Valerie Gray
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · KJohnson (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Bass
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-16 · KBattle/TThomas (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erica Adcock
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-10 · EBass/ASpanjers (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Valerie Gray
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 60.2% of games
3.0
71.1%
27W–11L · 57.6% of games
3.5
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.4% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 50% of games
6.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 54.5% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#2 Singles
9%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer