← Search

Shelly Steffey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gastonia, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
436 matches · 258W–178L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history436 matches
L
2026-10-08 · LSST-Steffey/Jetton · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sheila Hebert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · LHBE-Nyquist/Jetton 55+ 7.5 Wed pm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nathalie Naslund
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-03 · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-10-02 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-11 · ABvanMeter (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Medlock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · LHBE-Nyquist/Jetton 55+ 7.5 Wed pm · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nathalie Naslund
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · ABvanMeter (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Rivera
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-13 · LSST-Steffey/Jetton · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Cantello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · ABvanMeter (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Rivera
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Steffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-01 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Steffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams114 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.3% of games
3.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 43.3% of games
3.5
73.7%
146W–52L · 58.7% of games
4.0
35.5%
27W–49L · 44.9% of games
6.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 55.1% of games
7.5
56.2%
41W–32L · 51.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
117 matches
#1 Singles
26%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
54 matches
#2 Singles
9%
37 matches
#3 Singles
4%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer