← Search

Barry Bonikowski

Fort Mill, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 38W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Barry Bonikowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-08-19 · SSwanson (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-13 · BMogelefsky (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zachary Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-12 · SSwanson (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · MAhern/BBonikowski (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Pridnia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · LBowers/CBowers (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Lundberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Don Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Don Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Michael Bruder / Todd Lee
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with David Snearly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Paige Purvis / Lee Young
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Don Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-24 · LBowers/CBowers (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Mullis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · MAhern/BBonikowski (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Hollifield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · LBowers/CBowers (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Mullis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
100%
10W–0L · 70.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 18.2% of games
8.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 57.8% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams