Teams

declined 2: Spencer/LF

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 3.0 WOMEN-DAY

17 players · average NTRP 3.07 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-08vs Auschwitz/RH91Won 31
L#1 DoublesAmber Reynolds / Taylor Toliver vs Monica Auschwitz / Rachel Monks7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAshley Daugherty vs Michelle Hendrickson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnnie Richardson / Kay Jones vs Molly Barker / Lisa Coulter6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Spencer / Carissa Cooper vs Leigh Roy / Susamma Rajan5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-11-07vs Good/CRWon 41
W#1 DoublesSusan Hargis / Kelly Wilhelm vs Bethany Good / Noreen Peters6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrandi Phillips vs Michelle Pryer4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmber Reynolds / Carissa Cooper vs Brenda Lewis / Haley Ragsdale7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKeally Lilly vs Julie Chadwick6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Turner / Laura Keep vs Jessica Zimmerman / Diane Mareburger7-6, 6-0
2022-11-02vs declined: Irby/LFSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKay Jones / Keally Lilly vs Erin Collins / Cheryl Barnard1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Daugherty vs Angie Juarez6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCallie Wilson / Taylor Toliver vs Jodi Smith / Carol Wilson1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesSarah Darby vs Aja Howerton2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-31vs declined: Irby/LFWon 32
L#1 DoublesKay Jones / Taylor Toliver vs Cheryl Barnard / Carol Wilson4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAshley Daugherty vs Kelli Petersen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeally Lilly / Amber Reynolds vs Lisa Smallwood / Aja Howerton6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSarah Darby vs Alyssa Andrew1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJody Fitzgerald / Annie Richardson vs Meg Grewal / Jennifer Ziegler6-4, 6-4
2022-10-03vs Coffey/PHWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelly Wilhelm / Susan Hargis vs Barbara Smith / Annmarie Wright4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Daugherty vs Jessica Mardis6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Darby / Amber Reynolds vs Henri Sabin / Michelle Dickason3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBrandi Phillips vs Caroline Kelly7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCallie Wilson / Taylor Toliver vs Jill Jmaeff / Martha Endsley6-2, 6-0
2022-09-26vs Watling Red/SHWon 50
W#1 DoublesCallie Wilson / Taylor Toliver vs Crystal Stovall / Abbey Stallings6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAshley Daugherty vs Katie Arens6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Reynolds / Kelly Spencer vs Angel Kymes / Heather May6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrandi Phillips vs Amanda Stone6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarissa Cooper / Jody Fitzgerald vs Hilliary Lenhart / Kelly Wilkerson6-0, 6-0
2022-09-12vs Auschwitz/RH91Won 41
W#1 DoublesSusan Hargis / Kay Jones vs Angela Garcia / Leigh Roy6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKeally Lilly vs Michelle Hendrickson1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrandi Phillips / Emily Turner vs Rachel Monks / Cynthia Elias6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAshley Daugherty vs Monica Auschwitz6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaura Keep / Kelly Wilhelm vs Mindy Jones / Susamma Rajan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-08-29vs Willis/LFWon 32
L#1 DoublesSarah Darby / Amber Reynolds vs Kim Nix / Cheryl Willis4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Daugherty vs Shirley Miley6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCallie Wilson / Taylor Toliver vs Christa Hessen / Corinne Johnson6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCarissa Cooper vs Haven Willis2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMandy Pittman / Annie Richardson vs Beverly Colson / Karen Young6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1declined: Irby/LF7131923251
2declined: Davis/LF71281229296
3Blue 2: Watling Blue/SH71271329286
4declined 2: Spencer/LF71271337334
5Coffey/PH62281231312
6O'Hara/IS53241636316
7Watling Red/SH35152553398
8Gajan/LF26192146370
9Mordhorst/TTC26162453384
10Auschwitz/RH9117112963427
11Good/CR17112964439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Mandy Pittman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Ashley Daugherty
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.35
Taylor Toliver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.04
Sarah Darby
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Kay Jones
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Jody Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Brandi Phillips
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Kelly Wilhelm
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.81
Amber Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Susan Hargis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
2.77
Callie Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Annie Richardson
published 3
Emily Turner
published 3
2.75
Laura Keep
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Carissa Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.32
Kelly Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keally Lilly
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Callie Wilson + Taylor Toliver7554% games+12.9% vs expected
Amber Reynolds + Brandi Phillips6352% games+1.9% vs expected
Kay Jones + Susan Hargis11658% games+0.5% vs expected
Brandi Phillips + Keally Lilly101351% games−1.5% vs expected
Amber Reynolds + Emily Turner8552% games−1.8% vs expected
Carissa Cooper + Kelly Spencer2344% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Wilhelm + Kay Jones224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Wilhelm + Susan Hargis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mandy Pittman
135W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Ashley Daugherty
32W–12L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Taylor Toliver
85W–50L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Sarah Darby
37W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kay Jones
135W–129L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
Jody Fitzgerald
96W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Brandi Phillips
64W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
Kelly Wilhelm
67W–80L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Amber Reynolds
54W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Susan Hargis
88W–109L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Callie Wilson
32W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Annie Richardson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Emily Turner
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Keep
63W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Carissa Cooper
51W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
Kelly Spencer
44W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.32
Keally Lilly
48W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.