Teams

declined: Irby/LF

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over Day League · 3.0 WOMEN-DAY

17 players · average NTRP 3.69 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-07vs Coffey/PHWon 50
W#1 DoublesKelli Petersen / Emilee Irby vs Kim McGinty / Ginger Penn6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMolly Spencer vs Jessica Mardis6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJodi Smith / Angie Juarez vs Ginger Coffey / Jill Gulick3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRenee Haack vs Lisa Charvat6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Elder / Sarah ODonovan vs Henri Sabin / Ginger Ford6-4, 6-0
2022-11-02vs declined 2: Spencer/LFSplit 22
W#1 DoublesErin Collins / Cheryl Barnard vs Kay Jones / Keally Lilly6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAngie Juarez vs Ashley Daugherty1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAja Howerton vs Sarah Darby6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Elder / Meg Grewal vs Annie Richardson / Emily Turner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-31vs declined 2: Spencer/LFLost 23
W#1 DoublesCheryl Barnard / Carol Wilson vs Kay Jones / Taylor Toliver6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKelli Petersen vs Ashley Daugherty6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Smallwood / Aja Howerton vs Keally Lilly / Amber Reynolds0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlyssa Andrew vs Sarah Darby6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMeg Grewal / Jennifer Ziegler vs Jody Fitzgerald / Annie Richardson4-6, 4-6
2022-10-17vs Willis/LFWon 41
W#1 DoublesEmilee Irby / Alyssa Andrew vs Patricia Stuart / Christa Hessen6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCheryl Barnard vs Shirley Miley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJodi Smith / Kelli Petersen vs Kim Nix / Cheryl Willis6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMolly Spencer vs Denise Riley6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Elder / Meg Grewal vs Beverly Colson / Karen Carey6-1, 6-3
2022-10-03vs Auschwitz/RH91Won 50
W#1 DoublesAja Howerton / Lisa Smallwood vs Molly Barker / Rachel Monks6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRenee Haack vs Monica Auschwitz6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJodi Smith / Angie Juarez vs Cynthia Elias / Lisa Coulter6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKarlie Free vs Susamma Rajan6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah ODonovan / Meg Grewal vs Mindy Jones / Karen Forbes6-3, 6-3
2022-09-26vs Good/CRWon 41
W#1 DoublesKelli Petersen / Elizabeth Elder vs Bethany Good / Noreen Peters6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAngie Juarez vs Michelle Pryer6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheryl Barnard / Meg Grewal vs Kim Owen / Haley Ragsdale6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesJennifer Ziegler vs Jessica Zimmerman1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKarlie Free / Molly Spencer vs Liberty Gorospe / Julie Chadwick6-0, 6-2
2022-09-19vs Willis/LFWon 41
W#1 DoublesLisa Smallwood / Alyssa Andrew vs Karen Young / Lori Hubbard6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCheryl Barnard vs Shirley Miley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelli Petersen / Elizabeth Elder vs Karen Carey / Denise Riley6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAja Howerton vs Haven Willis5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah ODonovan / Meg Grewal vs Beverly Colson / Jean Sacra6-1, 6-3
2022-08-29vs Watling Red/SHWon 41
W#1 DoublesSarah ODonovan / Meg Grewal vs Crystal Stovall / Katie Arens3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelli Petersen vs Abbey Stallings5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJodi Smith / Erin Collins vs Heather May / Angel Kymes6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLisa Smallwood vs Hilliary Lenhart6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Ziegler / Aja Howerton vs Kristy Andrew / Kelly Wilkerson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 WOMEN-DAY
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1declined: Irby/LF7131923251
2declined: Davis/LF71281229296
3Blue 2: Watling Blue/SH71271329286
4declined 2: Spencer/LF71271337334
5Coffey/PH62281231312
6O'Hara/IS53241636316
7Watling Red/SH35152553398
8Gajan/LF26192146370
9Mordhorst/TTC26162453384
10Auschwitz/RH9117112963427
11Good/CR17112964439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Renee Haack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 11% · published
3.88
Kelli Petersen
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
3.81
Alyssa Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.81
Lisa Smallwood
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Angie Juarez
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.59
Cheryl Barnard
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.38
Molly Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.34
Emilee Irby
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Erin Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Carol Wilson
published 3.5
Elizabeth Elder
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Aja Howerton
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3.5
2.89
Sarah ODonovan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Meg Grewal
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.57
Jennifer Ziegler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jodi Smith
published
Karlie Free
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Haack + Lisa Smallwood7262% games+19.8% vs expected
Renee Haack + Alyssa Andrew34366% games+18.2% vs expected
Erin Collins + Cheryl Barnard17560% games+16.4% vs expected
Emilee Irby + Renee Haack7560% games+13.5% vs expected
Emilee Irby + Alyssa Andrew18463% games+13.1% vs expected
Carol Wilson + Jodi Smith4162% games+12.4% vs expected
Cheryl Barnard + Lisa Smallwood3257% games+12.2% vs expected
Kelli Petersen + Emilee Irby11263% games+11.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Haack
100W–39L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.91
Kelli Petersen
86W–32L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Alyssa Andrew
107W–36L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
Lisa Smallwood
109W–39L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Angie Juarez
107W–66L career · 11 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Cheryl Barnard
89W–40L career · 13 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.59
Molly Spencer
46W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Emilee Irby
106W–54L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Erin Collins
88W–57L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Carol Wilson
22W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Elder
35W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Aja Howerton
86W–62L career · 13 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Sarah ODonovan
57W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.89
Meg Grewal
56W–27L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.88
Jennifer Ziegler
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.57
Jodi Smith
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karlie Free
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.