Cooper FC/Findley-Urano W4.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

25 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule5 played

2026-06-25Won 1–0

W#3 DoublesCourtney Case / Ashli Urano vs Heather Vik / Kerry Schonwald6-1, 4-6, 1-0

2026-05-30Won 2–0

W#2 DoublesRachel Fagan / Livene Rose-Munoz vs Jessica Celentano / Natalie Timothy6-0, 6-4

W#3 DoublesCourtney Case / Caitlin Rhodes vs Mariajose Alvarez / Ellen Oliver6-3, 6-2

2026-05-16Lost 0–1

L#2 SinglesRachel Fagan vs Sarah Davis6-7, 2-6

2026-05-09vs Kiest/Campbell W4.5SSplit 1–1

L#1 SinglesRachel Fagan vs Chrystal Nickol Aranda6-4, 2-6, 0-1

W#2 SinglesSiya Sehgal vs Rachael Daniel1-1

2026-05-02Lost 0–1

L#2 SinglesSiya Sehgal vs Rema Thyagarajan0-6, 4-6

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings4 teams · S W. Saturday League

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Cooper FC/Findley-Urano W4.5S	6	2	28	12	31	294
2Fretz/Lu W4.5S	4	4	23	17	41	339
3Kiest/Campbell W4.5S	2	6	13	27	58	400
4LB Houston/Jeffery-Schonwald W4.5S	1	7	7	33	70	447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39

Ashley Reaves

usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 4.5

4.31

Caitlin Rhodes

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.26

Kate VandeBerghe

published —

4.25

Kristin Crosswait

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published —

4.25

Livene Rose-Munoz

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

4.25

Teresa Merklin

published —

4.25

Melissa Walters

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

4.19

Courtney Case

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

4.18

Brooke Cabianca

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

4.18

Ashli Urano

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

4.15

Aubrey Findley

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.14

HIROE BLACKLEDGE

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

4.14

Christina Colwell

usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5

4.11

Maki Berman

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

4.09

Vanessa Kelley

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

4.07

Heather Dossett

published —

4.01

Marcela Serna

usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published —

3.96

Mariana Devereaux

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

3.94

Jackie Reily

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

3.92

Laura Marroquin

usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 33% · published —

3.90

Gale Dunleavy

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Rachel Fagan

usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published —

—

Sallie Canan

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Siya Sehgal

usually #2 Singles 100% · published —

—

Sophia Coll

usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Cabianca + Kate VandeBerghe	27–10	55% games	+3.9% vs expected
Melissa Walters + Livene Rose-Munoz	7–4	57% games	−0.7% vs expected
Maki Berman + HIROE BLACKLEDGE	6–5	52% games	−1.7% vs expected
Aubrey Findley + Vanessa Kelley	5–6	46% games	−10.1% vs expected
Kate VandeBerghe + Kristin Crosswait	6–0	74% games	not enough data
Courtney Case + Heather Dossett	4–2	53% games	not enough data
Jackie Reily + Aubrey Findley	4–0	4 matches	not enough data
Jackie Reily + Livene Rose-Munoz	3–1	4 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5

Ashley Reaves

40W–11L career · 11 lines in 2026

<1%78%22%

4.39

4.5

Caitlin Rhodes

19W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026

1%90%9%

4.31

—

Kate VandeBerghe

77W–39L career · no lines in 2026

3%92%4%

4.26

—

Kristin Crosswait

16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026

4%93%4%

4.25

—

Livene Rose-Munoz

33W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026

4%93%4%

4.25

—

Teresa Merklin

18W–17L career · no lines in 2026

4%93%4%

4.25

—

Melissa Walters

30W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026

4%93%4%

4.25

4.5

Courtney Case

7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026

9%90%1%

4.19

4.5

Brooke Cabianca

28W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026

9%89%1%

4.18

4.5

Ashli Urano

19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026

10%89%1%

4.18

4.5

Aubrey Findley

47W–23L career · 12 lines in 2026

14%85%1%

4.15

—

HIROE BLACKLEDGE

27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026

15%84%1%

4.14

4.5

Christina Colwell

55W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026

16%83%<1%

4.14

—

Maki Berman

26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026

22%78%<1%

4.11

—

Vanessa Kelley

26W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026

25%74%<1%

4.09

—

Heather Dossett

4W–2L career · no lines in 2026

30%70%<1%

4.07

—

Marcela Serna

13W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026

46%54%<1%

4.01

—

Mariana Devereaux

6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026

63%37%<1%

3.96

—

Jackie Reily

25W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026

65%35%<1%

3.94

—

Laura Marroquin

28W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%71%29%

3.92

—

Gale Dunleavy

11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026

<1%77%23%

3.90

—

Rachel Fagan

3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sallie Canan

2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Siya Sehgal

11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sophia Coll

12W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.