Teams

Fretz/Lu W4.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-30vs Kiest/Campbell W4.5SSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyoko Suzuki / Makiko Bass vs Heather Steele Curtis / Jamie Debusk-Loop6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Montgomery / Carla Easter vs Hannah Walsh / Brittany Lax4-6, 0-3
2026-06-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesCecilia Hernandez / Pare Radillo-Underwood vs Mariajose Alvarez / Kera Watts6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRyoko Suzuki / Makiko Bass vs Natalie Timothy / Jessica Celentano6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Volz / Caroline Shewmaker vs Janine Pesusich / Jessica Celentano7-5, 6-1
2026-05-30vs Lifetime Plano/Pho-Bednar W4.5SSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStella Nguyen Bezabeh / Kristen Volz vs Melanie Finnegan / Sonia Moorthy1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCecilia Hernandez / Kathryn Smith vs Lindsay Betancourt / Ana Castano-Mears3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-16Split 11
L#2 DoublesKathryn Smith / Hannah Park vs Kate VandeBerghe / Kristin Crosswait1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristen Volz / Emily Lu vs Aubrey Findley / Vanessa Kelley6-3, 6-3
2026-05-02vs Kiest/Campbell W4.5SSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHannah Park / Carla Easter vs Averie Collins / Brittany Lax2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMakiko Bass / Ryoko Suzuki vs Krystal Holder / Hannah Walsh2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · S W. Saturday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cooper FC/Findley-Urano W4.5S62281231294
2Fretz/Lu W4.5S44231741339
3Kiest/Campbell W4.5S26132758400
4LB Houston/Jeffery-Schonwald W4.5S1773370447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Christy Vutam
usually #1 Singles 79%, also #2 Singles 21% · published 4.5
4.42
Caroline Shewmaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Alexandra Turck
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
4.35
Alyssa Bauer
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
Carla Easter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Emily Lu
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Alexandra Northington
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.16
Makiko Bass
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Cecilia Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Julia Su
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.01
Jill Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.99
Ryoko Suzuki
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Hannah Park
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Heather Turck
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Kristen Volz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Pare Radillo-Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stella Nguyen Bezabeh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Turck
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Turck + Victoria Turck3450% gamesnot enough data
Heather Turck + Alexandra Turck5258% gamesnot enough data
Ryoko Suzuki + Makiko Bass3249% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Hernandez + Caroline Shewmaker404 matchesnot enough data
Emily Lu + Victoria Turck033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Vutam
31W–12L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Caroline Shewmaker
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%27%
4.42
4.5
Alexandra Turck
26W–17L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.36
4.5
Alyssa Bauer
31W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Carla Easter
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Lu
19W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Alexandra Northington
15W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Makiko Bass
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Cecilia Hernandez
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
Julia Su
22W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Jill Montgomery
17W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
Ryoko Suzuki
23W–37L career · 8 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.99
Hannah Park
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Heather Turck
13W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Volz
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pare Radillo-Underwood
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stella Nguyen Bezabeh
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Turck
11W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.