Teams

Lifetime Plano/Pho-Bednar W4.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

23 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily McRae / Natalia Prinz vs Aubrey Findley / Katherine Johnston5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarian Bednar / Natalia Prinz vs Natalie Stewart / Laura Lusk6-3, 6-1
2026-05-30vs Fretz/Lu W4.5SLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily McRae / Lauren Vaughn vs Heather Turck / Alexandra Turck2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Betancourt / Ana Castano-Mears vs Cecilia Hernandez / Kathryn Smith6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-23vs Kiest/Campbell W4.5SWon 20
W#2 SinglesLindsay Betancourt vs Gilda Tebeaux6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Butcher / Natalia Prinz vs Heidi Paredes / Ashley Paredes6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Celesta Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Luisa Osorio
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.38
Melanie Finnegan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.33
Kayleigh Holt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.32
Yvon Pho
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.31
Sonia Moorthy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Marian Bednar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.28
Keasha Behrman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.28
Ana Castano-Mears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Audra Hopper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Rema Thyagarajan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.26
Traci Boddie
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
4.25
Amy Gale
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4.5
4.20
Sandy Mora
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.15
Audrey Wendel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Breann Fierro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Teri Ware
published
4.09
Adriana Akhtar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Lindsay Betancourt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.98
Ashley Longoria
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Natalia Prinz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Emily McRae
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Olivia Arroyo
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Moorthy + Melanie Finnegan7560% games+10.5% vs expected
Audrey Wendel + Traci Boddie8360% games+3.9% vs expected
Celesta Caldwell + Melanie Finnegan314 matchesnot enough data
Ana Castano-Mears + Audra Hopper314 matchesnot enough data
Yvon Pho + Amy Gale404 matchesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Keasha Behrman123 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Mora + Adriana Akhtar123 matchesnot enough data
Teri Ware + Marian Bednar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Celesta Caldwell
31W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.41
Luisa Osorio
35W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.41
Melanie Finnegan
15W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
4.38
Kayleigh Holt
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Yvon Pho
27W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Sonia Moorthy
34W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Marian Bednar
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
Keasha Behrman
33W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Ana Castano-Mears
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Audra Hopper
15W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Rema Thyagarajan
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Traci Boddie
24W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Amy Gale
16W–4L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
Sandy Mora
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Audrey Wendel
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Breann Fierro
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
Teri Ware
22W–14L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Adriana Akhtar
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Lindsay Betancourt
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Ashley Longoria
30W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.98
Natalia Prinz
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.83
Emily McRae
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Arroyo
15W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.