Teams

MEMPK FURR

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-23vs CCW YOUNGWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Annette Markert vs Kim Young / Tracy Slater6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-16vs CSRC BROCKLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Amanda Irons vs Martha Walker / Stephanie Brock0-6, 5-7
2024-05-09vs LTFCS WISNERLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Amanda Irons vs Lisa Bischoff / Xiaohong Zhang4-6, 3-6
2024-05-02vs CCW YOUNGLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmanda Irons vs Cassandra Spero1-6, 1-6
2024-04-25vs CSRC BROCKLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Katherine Crumpton vs Alohalani Kaleo / Kelly Cavanaugh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-18vs LTFCS WISNERWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaron Dumler / Annette Markert vs Julie Haynie / Sara Callender1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annette Markert
published 3.5
3.21
Maria Langer
published
3.19
Jennifer Furr
published
3.18
Amanda Irons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Carol Presicci
published 3.5
3.13
Caron Dumler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Aimee Anderson
published 3.5
2.96
Katherine Crumpton
published
2.80
Kirsten Matheson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caron Dumler + Amanda Irons5948% games−5.1% vs expected
Katherine Crumpton + Kirsten Matheson033 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Matheson + Carol Presicci123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annette Markert
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Langer
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Furr
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carol Presicci
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Caron Dumler
52W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Aimee Anderson
20W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Katherine Crumpton
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.96
Kirsten Matheson
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.