Teams

LTFCS WISNER

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-23vs CSRC BROCKWon 32
W#1 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Edgar vs Martha Walker / Marian Nelson7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Bischoff / Sue Arntzen vs Kimberly McLaurin / Stephanie Brock3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesErin Reed vs Vincenta van Every3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesXiaohong Zhang / Hanhua Wu vs Susan Anderson / Margaret Gullickson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-16vs CCW YOUNGLost 14
L#1 DoublesSara Callender / Sue Arntzen vs Kim Young / Stacy Geisler6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Bischoff vs Cassandra Spero2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Walton / Shelly Schmidt vs Kele Hauke / Erin Contreras7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesErin Reed vs Tracy Slater2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHanhua Wu / Xiaohong Zhang vs Maggie Ward / Sara Cook6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-05-09vs MEMPK FURRWon 50
W#1 DoublesLisa Bischoff / Xiaohong Zhang vs Caron Dumler / Amanda Irons6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs Maria Langer6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSara Callender / Sue Arntzen vs Laura Kilpatrick / Carol Presicci6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHanhua Wu vs Aimee Anderson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Walton / Shelly Schmidt vs Jennifer Furr / Lori Doutrich4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-02vs CSRC BROCKLost 05
L#1 DoublesJulie Haynie / Sue Arntzen vs Stephanie Brock / Amy Jones6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs Kimberly McLaurin0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Edgar vs Martha Walker / Marian Nelson4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHanhua Wu vs Vincenta van Every1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesXiaohong Zhang / Sara Callender vs Margaret Gullickson / Christi Andress3-6, 4-6
2024-04-25vs CCW YOUNGLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Bischoff / Rebecca Cuntz vs Erin Contreras / Kele Hauke5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs Cassandra Spero2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJane Wisner / Linda Edgar vs Stacy Geisler / Tracy Slater0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesErin Reed vs Lori Littleford1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShelly Schmidt / Karen Walton vs Sara Cook / Judith Coughlin7-5, 6-0
2024-04-18vs MEMPK FURRLost 23
L#1 DoublesJulie Haynie / Sara Callender vs Caron Dumler / Annette Markert1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLisa Bischoff vs Laura Kilpatrick6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Walton / Shelly Schmidt vs Kirsten Matheson / Carol Presicci2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHanhua Wu vs Maria Langer4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Wisner / Xiaohong Zhang vs Jennifer Furr / Lori Doutrich6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Carmen Ekblad
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Julie Haynie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Hanhua Wu
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Lisa Bischoff
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Sue Arntzen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Jane Wisner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Edgar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Xiaohong Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.03
Sara Callender
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Erin Reed
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Karen Walton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Cuntz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Callender + Lisa Bischoff3353% games+0.3% vs expected
Jane Wisner + Linda Edgar312553% games−1.0% vs expected
Sara Callender + Sue Arntzen3348% games−3.1% vs expected
Lisa Bischoff + Rebecca Cuntz3449% games−5.2% vs expected
Sue Arntzen + Rebecca Cuntz3353% gamesnot enough data
Xiaohong Zhang + Hanhua Wu5159% gamesnot enough data
Sue Arntzen + Lisa Bischoff2355% gamesnot enough data
Julie Haynie + Carmen Ekblad4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carmen Ekblad
81W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Julie Haynie
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Hanhua Wu
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Bischoff
27W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Sue Arntzen
17W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jane Wisner
89W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11
Linda Edgar
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Xiaohong Zhang
22W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Sara Callender
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Erin Reed
64W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Karen Walton
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Cuntz
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.