Teams

Sara Davis

2025 Singles League 18&over-NE · 3.0 Women Singles

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-07vs GammillWon 21
W#1 SinglesPerrish Dragovits vs Joy Whittle3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Elizabeth Barnitz3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSara Davis vs Rebekah Wiseman1-6, 0-6
2025-12-03vs GammillLost 12
W#1 SinglesPerrish Dragovits vs Elise Mcmasters7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Genee Summers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSara Davis vs Joy Whittle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-18vs Erin JonesWon 21
W#1 SinglesReika Sato vs Erin Jones7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Beth Nolan6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesTabi Talley vs Miranda Chapman4-6, 3-6
2025-11-16vs GammillLost 03
L#1 SinglesPerrish Dragovits vs Sara Gammill5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTabi Talley vs Joy Whittle5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesReika Sato vs Ashton Scarborough4-6, 5-7
2025-11-12vs Erin JonesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSara Davis vs Gentry Parker3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Beth Nolan6-2, 6-1
2025-11-05vs Erin JonesWon 21
W#1 SinglesReika Sato vs Erin Jones6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAlicia Milstead vs Gentry Parker6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesPerrish Dragovits vs Patti Carroll6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Reika Sato
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
2.55
Sara Davis
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.53
Alicia Milstead
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.48
Perrish Dragovits
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.24
Tabi Talley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Davis + Alicia Milstead123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reika Sato
33W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
Sara Davis
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
3
Alicia Milstead
23W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Perrish Dragovits
11W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.48
Tabi Talley
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.