Teams

Gammill

2025 Singles League 18&over-NE · 3.0 Women Singles

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-07vs Sara DavisLost 12
L#1 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Perrish Dragovits6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Barnitz vs Alicia Milstead6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRebekah Wiseman vs Sara Davis6-1, 6-0
2025-12-03vs Sara DavisWon 21
L#1 SinglesElise Mcmasters vs Perrish Dragovits6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGenee Summers vs Alicia Milstead4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Sara Davis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-11-16vs Sara DavisWon 30
W#1 SinglesSara Gammill vs Perrish Dragovits7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Tabi Talley7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Reika Sato6-4, 7-5
2025-11-11vs Erin JonesWon 30
W#1 SinglesElise Mcmasters vs Erin Jones6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGenee Summers vs Kristie Studdard6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRebekah Wiseman vs Patti Carroll6-0, 6-0
2025-11-04vs Erin JonesWon 30
W#1 SinglesSara Gammill vs Erin Jones3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Barnitz vs Miranda Chapman6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Sherry Vance6-0, 6-1
2025-11-02vs Erin JonesWon 30
W#1 SinglesAshton Scarborough vs Erin Jones6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSara Gammill vs Gentry Parker7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJoy Whittle vs Patti Carroll6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gammill511539114
2Sara Davis429921147
3Erin Jones0631531202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Elise Mcmasters
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Ashton Scarborough
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.96
Rebekah Wiseman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.94
Elizabeth Barnitz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Genee Summers
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Sara Gammill
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.68
Joy Whittle
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genee Summers + Elizabeth Barnitz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elise Mcmasters
56W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Ashton Scarborough
62W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Rebekah Wiseman
37W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Elizabeth Barnitz
43W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Genee Summers
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
Sara Gammill
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Joy Whittle
42W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%8%92%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.