Teams

FLYHS SAXBY

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-24vs CCW BUTLERWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Morino / Maggie Wilson vs Leanne Thompson / Emily Butler6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLorin Barcus vs Noriko Moody6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Saxby / Chelsey Wright vs April Falk / Wendy Jones6-4, 6-2
2026-08-17vs LTFCS EKBLADWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaggie Wilson / Melissa Morino vs Ellie Ruge / Salome D'Silva6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLorin Barcus vs Danica Marco6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKara Jewett / Amy Saxby vs Leda Afuang / Laura Schafer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-03vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Morino / Maggie Wilson vs Jessica Whisenant / Kateri Kerwin6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKara Jewett vs Victoria Knight2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChelsey Wright / Kristi Creps vs Kelly Banet / Kady Hommel6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-27vs MEMPK JOHNSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Morino / Maggie Wilson vs Gina Scheper / Kayla Breedlove6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKara Jewett vs Megan Burton1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Saxby / Chelsey Wright vs Kimberly McLaurin / Claudia Goddard6-1, 6-4
2026-07-20vs CCOC BAILEYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChelsey Wright / Kristi Creps vs Jillian Mayles / Jordana Land3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKara Jewett / Melissa Morino vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Melissa Morino
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.93
Amy Saxby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Lorin Barcus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.81
Chelsey Wright
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Kristi Creps
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Kara Jewett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsey Wright + Amy Saxby11363% games+1.5% vs expected
Kristi Creps + Chelsey Wright4452% games−3.3% vs expected
Kristi Creps + Amy Saxby224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa Morino
106W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.17
4
Amy Saxby
29W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Lorin Barcus
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Chelsey Wright
53W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Kristi Creps
58W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Kara Jewett
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.