Teams

CSRC MCPHERSON

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-24vs CSRC CORRALLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Olivia Salmon vs Jennifer Mutka / Jane Corral7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelly Banet vs CLAUDIA GRAVER1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Finnerty / Kateri Kerwin vs Gina Baaklini / Carolayne Henry1-6, 2-6
2026-08-17vs CCW BUTLERWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Whisenant / Kady Hommel vs Wendy Jones / Leanne Thompson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKelly Banet vs Eline Haak7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKateri Kerwin / Liz Finnerty vs Cassandra Spero / Noriko Moody6-3, 7-5
2026-08-10vs LTFCS EKBLADWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Rhoten / Sara Scroggins vs Laura Schafer / Leda Afuang6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesOlivia Salmon vs Ellie Ruge6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKateri Kerwin / Liz Finnerty vs Salome D'Silva / Carmen Ekblad6-2, 6-2
2026-08-03vs FLYHS SAXBYWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessica Whisenant / Kateri Kerwin vs Melissa Morino / Maggie Wilson4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesVictoria Knight vs Kara Jewett6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Banet / Kady Hommel vs Chelsey Wright / Kristi Creps3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-27vs CCOC BAILEYWon 30
W#1 DoublesOlivia Salmon / Nancy Barker vs Kristina Bodoczky / Barbi Bailey6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVictoria Knight vs Jillian Mayles7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWendy Rhoten / Sara Scroggins vs Megan May / Jordana Land2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Nancy Barker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Kady Hommel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Olivia Salmon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.79
Sara Scroggins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Jessica Whisenant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Kateri Kerwin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Kelly Banet
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Wendy Rhoten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Liz Finnerty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lori McPherson
published
Victoria Knight
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barker + Olivia Salmon8453% games−0.3% vs expected
Sara Scroggins + Wendy Rhoten201751% games−1.1% vs expected
Lori McPherson + Kady Hommel2342% games−1.3% vs expected
Kateri Kerwin + Jessica Whisenant4250% gamesnot enough data
Kateri Kerwin + Liz Finnerty213 matchesnot enough data
Kady Hommel + Jessica Whisenant123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Kady Hommel
90W–80L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Olivia Salmon
56W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Sara Scroggins
49W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Jessica Whisenant
21W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Kateri Kerwin
35W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Kelly Banet
26W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Wendy Rhoten
32W–52L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Liz Finnerty
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Lori McPherson
12W–15L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Victoria Knight
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.