Teams

SKY RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs HV YELLOWWon 21
L#1 DoublesSteven Mihan / Brooks Pearson vs Cody Gale / NATE KRULISH6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDouglas Poirier / Andrew Hagen vs David Croci / Alejo Marugan6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKevin Fitzgerald / Joshua Solot vs Mark Figley / Derek Pimm4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-07vs HG REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTom Parnell / Philip Briere vs Brian Zook / Matt Budler7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAndrew Hagen vs Dick Bernauer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Mihan / Thomas Abell vs Ryan Goodale / Kyle Sourk4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoshua Solot / Kevin Fitzgerald vs Jim Malcolm / Benjamin McElhiney0-6, 1-6
2026-06-30vs GCC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesPhilip Briere / Evan Dechtman vs Guto de Araujo / Stephen Avis4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTom Parnell vs Mike Fasing6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrooks Pearson / Thomas Abell vs Robert Clarke / Matthew Larson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDouglas Poirier / Joshua Solot vs Bob Trigg / Paul Sveen6-4, 6-2
2026-06-23vs ATC BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesThomas Abell / Evan Dechtman vs James Sigman / Nick Josephs6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrew Hagen vs William Pucillo7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrooks Pearson / Douglas Poirier vs Josh Dickman / Jeffrey Jones6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMatthew Stenmark / Philip Briere vs Erik Springer / Peter Goeren6-4, 6-3
2026-06-16vs SS-H GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJoshua Solot / Evan Dechtman vs John Astle / Craig Jacobson5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesThomas Abell vs Darrell Stevenson6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrooks Pearson / Douglas Poirier vs Tim Pansini / Roger Gonzalez3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Stenmark / Kevin Fitzgerald vs John Holtz / Keith Bope6-0, 6-2
2026-06-09vs HV YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesEvan Dechtman / Tom Parnell vs NATE KRULISH / David Croci6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrew Hagen vs Cody Gale6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPhilip Briere / Thomas Abell vs Sean Mcbrearty / Alejo Marugan5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Stenmark / Steven Mihan vs Drennen Schulz / Derek Pimm6-0, 6-2
2026-06-02vs HG REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Hagen / Evan Dechtman vs Jim Malcolm / Kyle Sourk6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTom Parnell vs John Anderson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrooks Pearson / Douglas Poirier vs Miles David / Jeff Gruidel6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Andrew Hagen
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Matthew Stenmark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Brooks Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Tom Parnell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Steven Mihan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Philip Briere
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Thomas Abell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Kevin Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Evan Dechtman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Joshua Solot
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Douglas Poirier
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Briere + Brooks Pearson5257% games+7.4% vs expected
Philip Briere + Thomas Abell3256% games−1.8% vs expected
Joshua Solot + Brooks Pearson314 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Solot + Kevin Fitzgerald123 matchesnot enough data
Philip Briere + Andrew Hagen123 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Poirier + Brooks Pearson213 matchesnot enough data
Brooks Pearson + Thomas Abell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Hagen
47W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
Matthew Stenmark
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Brooks Pearson
97W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Tom Parnell
77W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Steven Mihan
68W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Philip Briere
61W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Thomas Abell
29W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Kevin Fitzgerald
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Evan Dechtman
19W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Joshua Solot
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Douglas Poirier
45W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.