Teams

HV YELLOW

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.28 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs SKY REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesCody Gale / NATE KRULISH vs Steven Mihan / Brooks Pearson7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Croci / Alejo Marugan vs Douglas Poirier / Andrew Hagen1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMark Figley / Derek Pimm vs Kevin Fitzgerald / Joshua Solot6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-07vs GCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAlejo Marugan / David Croci vs Scott Blechman / Guto de Araujo4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrew Goltermann vs Mark Potts5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDerek Pimm / Cody Gale vs James Dempsey / Robert Clarke6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDrennen Schulz / Alex Beltz vs Bob Trigg / Rick Thomas2-6, 4-6
2026-07-06vs SS-H GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesCody Gale / Sean Mcbrearty vs Craig Jacobson / Tim Pansini3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAlex Beltz vs Devon Nieto0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlejo Marugan / Derek Pimm vs John Astle / Gary Rubida4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Goltermann / NATE KRULISH vs John Holtz / Darrell Stevenson6-3, 6-3
2026-06-23vs HG REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrew Goltermann / NATE KRULISH vs Matt Budler / John Anderson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCody Gale vs Ryan Goodale6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSean Mcbrearty / Jason Reinking vs John Cadkin / Jim Malcolm6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlex Beltz / Drennen Schulz vs Greg Johnson / Benjamin McElhiney3-6, 2-6
2026-06-16vs ATC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Croci / Cody Gale vs Jeff Chain / William Pucillo1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrew Goltermann vs Richard Heppe6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSean Mcbrearty / Jason Reinking vs James Sigman / Nick Josephs7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Beltz / Derek Pimm vs Eric Hewitt / Peter Goeren5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-09vs SKY REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesNATE KRULISH / David Croci vs Evan Dechtman / Tom Parnell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCody Gale vs Andrew Hagen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSean Mcbrearty / Alejo Marugan vs Philip Briere / Thomas Abell7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDrennen Schulz / Derek Pimm vs Matthew Stenmark / Steven Mihan0-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs GCC REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesNATE KRULISH / Jason Reinking vs Matthew McCord / Mark Potts1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlejo Marugan vs Guto de Araujo4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSean Mcbrearty / David Croci vs Scott Blechman / Kenneth Hunt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlex Beltz / Drennen Schulz vs James Dempsey / Paul Sveen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Cody Gale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
David Croci
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
NATE KRULISH
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Andrew Goltermann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Jason Reinking
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Sean Mcbrearty
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Mark Figley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Derek Pimm
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Alejo Marugan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Alex Beltz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.70
Drennen Schulz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Figley + NATE KRULISH2844% games−2.5% vs expected
Alex Beltz + Drennen Schulz0931% games−4.2% vs expected
Jason Reinking + NATE KRULISH1636% games−6.9% vs expected
Mark Figley + Jason Reinking1541% games−7.3% vs expected
NATE KRULISH + Andrew Goltermann2447% gamesnot enough data
Derek Pimm + Alex Beltz2340% gamesnot enough data
Derek Pimm + Andrew Goltermann134 matchesnot enough data
Derek Pimm + Cody Gale224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cody Gale
25W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
David Croci
3W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
NATE KRULISH
32W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrew Goltermann
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Jason Reinking
27W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.13
Sean Mcbrearty
1W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Mark Figley
31W–46L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Derek Pimm
11W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Alejo Marugan
10W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Alex Beltz
4W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Drennen Schulz
1W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.