Teams

Na.Gugliotta40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-10-04vs Je.McIntyre40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesLUCY LAV / Kathryn Beth Beam vs Dale Roane / Louise Warenda6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Gugliotta / Monica Collins vs Julia Harris / Tyler Cunningham0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-27vs Da.Haney40CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatalie Regan / Monica Collins vs Dara Haney / Kelli Williams7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaphne Driscoll / Susie EL-Kaissi vs Jeanmarie Warren / Michele Fitzsimons6-3, 6-4
2023-09-25vs Je.McIntyre40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Regan / Julie Raftery vs Jessica McIntyre / Brette Best3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLUCY LAV / Susie EL-Kaissi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-20vs St.Luther40C7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMonica Collins / Julie Raftery vs Dana Chapman / Adrienne Padilla6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNancy Gugliotta / Daphne Driscoll vs Molly Briggs / Dana Rawls0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusie EL-Kaissi / LUCY LAV vs Stephanie Luther / Fran Ange4-6, 2-6
2023-09-13vs Me.Everitt40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracey Carlin / Nancy Gugliotta vs Susan Paeplow / Laura Rendon3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Regan / Kathryn Beth Beam vs Mary Jo Dunnington / Ana DeHart6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Raftery / Leslie Wright vs Camille Gibbs / Janet Sprague6-2, 6-3
2023-09-06vs Ma.Tulenko40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Regan / Julie Raftery vs Jane Williams / Averil Glover6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Gugliotta / Monica Collins vs Sandra Chapman-Wilson / Rebekah Sedaca3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusie EL-Kaissi / Leslie Wright vs Kathy Demase / Cheryl Sweitzer6-2, 6-3
2023-08-23vs Da.Haney40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Regan / Julie Raftery vs Susan Haughney / Jeanmarie Warren6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeslie Wright / LUCY LAV vs Erica Walton / Carrie Rice6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracey Carlin / Ashley Walton vs Susan Wilkerson / Beth Robertson6-3, 6-1
2023-08-16vs St.Luther40C7.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Gugliotta / Daphne Driscoll vs Sherrie Lefere / Annette Page2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracey Carlin / LUCY LAV vs Fran Ange / Julia Killian1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusie EL-Kaissi / Stacey Moritz vs Dana Chapman / Adrienne Padilla5-7, 2-6
2023-08-09vs Me.Everitt40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracey Carlin / Natalie Regan vs Erin McAllister / Melissa House6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Gugliotta / Stacey Moritz vs Lola Jefferies / Elizabeth Schuette3-6, 4-6
2023-08-02vs Ma.Tulenko40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Regan / Monica Collins vs Jane Williams / Averil Glover7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDaphne Driscoll / Julie Raftery vs Sandra Chapman-Wilson / Mary Tulenko2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Gugliotta / Phoebe Hill vs Donna Wells / Cheryl Sweitzer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Tracey Carlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Susie EL-Kaissi
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.46
Julie Raftery
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
published
3.40
Nancy Gugliotta
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Natalie Regan
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.25
LUCY LAV
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.24
Ashley Walton
published 3.5
Phoebe Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Carlin + LUCY LAV12364% games+12.1% vs expected
LUCY LAV + Susie EL-Kaissi312060% games+1.9% vs expected
Nancy Gugliotta + Natalie Regan191054% games−1.5% vs expected
Natalie Regan + Susie EL-Kaissi9857% games−2.2% vs expected
Susie EL-Kaissi + Julie Raftery8461% gamesnot enough data
Natalie Regan + Julie Raftery7456% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Gugliotta + Susie EL-Kaissi3747% gamesnot enough data
LUCY LAV + Julie Raftery3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracey Carlin
156W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Susie EL-Kaissi
253W–127L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Julie Raftery
156W–120L career · 11 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Nancy Gugliotta
166W–152L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Natalie Regan
160W–123L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
LUCY LAV
231W–188L career · 10 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ashley Walton
18W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Phoebe Hill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.