Teams

Da.Haney40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-04vs Ma.Tulenko40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDara Haney / Kelly Sutton vs Kathy Demase / Sharon Horton6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-09-27vs Na.Gugliotta40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDara Haney / Kelli Williams vs Natalie Regan / Monica Collins5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-20vs Me.Everitt40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesDara Haney / Erica Walton vs Camille Gibbs / Janet Sprague0-6, 2-6
2023-09-17vs Ma.Tulenko40CWon 10
W#1 DoublesDara Haney / Erica Walton vs Cheryl Sweitzer / Donna Wells6-3, 6-2
2023-09-06vs St.Luther40C7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDara Haney / Beth Robertson vs Dana Chapman / Adrienne Padilla6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-16vs Me.Everitt40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesDara Haney / Kelly Sutton vs Gabrielle Shields / Melissa Everitt1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-08-09vs Je.McIntyre40CWon 10
W#2 DoublesDara Haney / Erica Walton vs Julia Harris / Allison Smith4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-02vs St.Luther40C7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDara Haney / Michele Fitzsimons vs Dana Chapman / Adrienne Padilla3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Dara Haney
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.20
Michele Fitzsimons
published
3.16
Carrie Rice
published 3.5
3.11
Susan Haughney
published
3.07
Susan Wilkerson
published
3.06
Kelleigh Russo
published
3.03
Kelly Sutton
published
2.82
Beth Robertson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dara Haney + Kelly Sutton5159% games+4.7% vs expected
Dara Haney + Beth Robertson404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Wilkerson + Dara Haney303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Wilkerson + Kelleigh Russo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dara Haney
188W–138L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Michele Fitzsimons
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carrie Rice
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Susan Haughney
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
Susan Wilkerson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
Kelleigh Russo
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Kelly Sutton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Beth Robertson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.