Teams

Honey, Deuce

2023 40&Over Women · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-13vs McDermott/StonerLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelissa Garofalo / Kathleen Wilmot vs Beth McDermott / Susan Odonovan1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Sinclair Parker vs Neerja Bhatnagar0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDevon Natapow / Beth Siebert vs Sandra Couture / Paula Newlands6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKris Kohler / Mary Clare vs Astride Schifano / Cathleen Kausch2-6, 3-6
2023-07-12vs Smash GirlsLost 13
W#1 DoublesMelissa Garofalo / Joanne Parkes vs Yulia Nedelko / Elizabeth Thurnherr6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Sinclair Parker vs Shelley Alfieri4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Wilmot / Mary Clare vs Fauna Pappalardo-Minges / Beth Klintworth4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKris Kohler / Jane Eckhardt vs Shawn Woychick / Jane Mulvehill5-7, 6-7
2023-06-22vs Western: GoLost 04
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Sinclair Parker / Melissa Garofalo vs Caroline Burton / Mary-Beth Rumble2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSara Kelch vs Sara Miller1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Parkes / Kathleen Wilmot vs Kathleen Savage / Nancy O'Brien1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Clare / Jane Eckhardt vs Lisa Hayes / Victoria Briggs0-6, 0-6
2023-06-15vs McDermott/StonerLost 13
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Sinclair Parker / Amy Judson vs Sandra Couture / Julia Applebaum6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSara Kelch vs Lori Green6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Parkes / Amy Crossed vs Beth McDermott / Susan Odonovan2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Eckhardt / Kris Kohler vs Astride Schifano / Anne Ide1-6, 1-6
2023-06-08vs Smash GirlsWon 40
W#1 DoublesDevon Natapow / Beth Siebert vs Jane Mulvehill / Shawn Woychick6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJacqueline Sinclair Parker vs Linda Pringle6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElle Johnson / Joanne Parkes vs Kathleen Krenzer / Shelley Alfieri6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Eckhardt / Kris Kohler vs Beth Klintworth / Lisa McConnell6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-01vs Western: GoLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoanne Parkes / Jacqueline Sinclair Parker vs Tanya Zutshi / Tricia Rupright1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElle Johnson / Amy Crossed vs Carol Eisenman / Kathleen Savage1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Eckhardt / Kris Kohler vs Caroline Burton / Victoria Briggs0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Go062137118
2McDermott/Stoner06121226192
3Smash Girls0681634237
4Honey, Deuce0671737249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Devon Natapow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Joanne Parkes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.48
Amy Judson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Beth Siebert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Amy Crossed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elle Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Sinclair Parker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Sara Kelch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.76
Kathleen Wilmot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Jane Eckhardt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kris Kohler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Clare
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Melissa Garofalo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devon Natapow + Amy Judson8260% games+8.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Sinclair Parker + Joanne Parkes2537% games+0.6% vs expected
Jane Eckhardt + Kris Kohler71141% games−3.6% vs expected
Amy Crossed + Elle Johnson3358% gamesnot enough data
Mary Clare + Kathleen Wilmot044 matchesnot enough data
Beth Siebert + Devon Natapow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Devon Natapow
48W–18L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
Joanne Parkes
37W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Amy Judson
49W–21L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Beth Siebert
10W–23L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Amy Crossed
55W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elle Johnson
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jacqueline Sinclair Parker
25W–53L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Kelch
42W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Kathleen Wilmot
37W–74L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Jane Eckhardt
40W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kris Kohler
16W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Clare
2W–26L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Garofalo
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.