Teams

LATA18/Harrison/SSP

2022 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-06vs LATA18/Howle/RCLost 01
L#2 DoublesRhett Corley / Pete Kleemoff vs Kemper Amick / Lucius Jumper5-7, 3-6
2022-03-30vs LATA18/McCarthy/LCTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesDon Harrison / Pete Kleemoff vs Shawn McCarthy / Jack Harle6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-23vs LATA18/Henderson/LCTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesDuke Taylor / Pete Kleemoff vs Guy Wood / Colin Raynor3-6, 1-6
2022-03-16vs LATA18/Howle/RCWon 10
W#3 DoublesDuke Taylor / Pete Kleemoff vs Oderra Small / Mike Swindall6-3, 6-2
2022-03-09vs LATA18/McCarthy/LCTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLucas Berresford / Pete Kleemoff vs Aaron Hilton / Jon Sandy6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-02vs LATA18/Henderson/LCTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesPete Kleemoff / Duke Taylor vs Ted McGee / Christopher Pricenor7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-16vs LATA18/McCarthy/LCTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesPete Kleemoff / Bernie Dreher vs Shawn McCarthy / Glenn Kitchens2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-09vs LATA18/Henderson/LCTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesPete Kleemoff / Duke Taylor vs Nathan Sanders / Ben Freiburger2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Matthew Isenhower
published
3.38
William Jordan
published
3.31
Terrance Wingfield
published
Jake Senn
published 3.5
3.23
Duke Taylor
published 3.5
3.11
Jason Isenhower
published
3.11
Gregg Senn
published 3.5
3.08
Pete Kleemoff
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Lucas Berresford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Isenhower + Duke Taylor314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Isenhower
12W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
William Jordan
28W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
Terrance Wingfield
40W–26L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jake Senn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Duke Taylor
7W–18L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jason Isenhower
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gregg Senn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Pete Kleemoff
127W–159L career · 8 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Lucas Berresford
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.