Teams

LATA18/Henderson/LCTC

2022 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-10vs LATA18/McCarthy/LCTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Mucci / Guy Wood vs Shawn McCarthy / Pat Fountain6-0, 6-2
2022-03-30vs LATA18/Howle/RCLost 01
L#3 DoublesCraig Mucci / Santiago Perez-Shillington vs Larry Ellisor / Jeffrey Anderson6-7, 5-7
2022-03-23vs LATA18/McCarthy/LCTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Pricenor / Craig Mucci vs Josh Kitchens / Troy Cody7-5, 6-1
2022-03-23vs LATA18/Harrison/SSPWon 10
W#3 DoublesCraig Mucci / Kris Ancone vs Gregg Senn / Cole Taylor6-3, 6-2
2022-02-23vs LATA18/McCarthy/LCTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoger Sears / Craig Mucci vs Troy Cody / Nitin Jain6-3, 6-3
2022-02-09vs LATA18/Harrison/SSPLost 01
L#2 DoublesCraig Mucci / Kris Ancone vs Lucas Berresford / Cole Taylor6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Ben Freiburger
published 4
David Terry
published 4
3.50
Nathan Sanders
published
3.40
Guy Wood
published 3.5
3.38
Colin Raynor
published 3.5
3.38
Roger Sears
published
3.34
Craig Mucci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Brian Heaberlin
published 3.5
3.26
3.12
Allen Henderson
published 3.5
Michael Guffee
published
Ted McGee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Guffee + Roger Sears15557% games−1.9% vs expected
Michael Guffee + Colin Raynor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Freiburger
30W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
David Terry
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Santiago Perez-Shillington
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Nathan Sanders
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Guy Wood
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Colin Raynor
38W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
Roger Sears
52W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Craig Mucci
197W–128L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Brian Heaberlin
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christopher Pricenor
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Allen Henderson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Michael Guffee
52W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ted McGee
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.