Teams

Smith 18+ Singles

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.0 Women 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-24vs CFCC- WitmerWon 21
W#1 SinglesCatherine Strickland vs Carrie Rankin6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSarah Brickels vs Katie Oden2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPatricia Furbay vs Beth Peele6-2, 6-1
2025-02-24vs Taylor/MoyseyWon 21
W#1 SinglesSara Fagel vs Aileen Sutton6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCatherine Strickland vs Alice Weiser6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesSarah Brickels vs Heather Martin4-6, 2-6
2025-02-15vs Pierson 18+Won 21
W#1 SinglesPatricia Furbay vs Holly Dameron6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLakitha Smith vs Tracy Pierson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJessica Holleman vs Kelly Cole6-7, 4-6
2025-02-09vs MonahanWon 30
W#1 SinglesSara Fagel vs Julia Vogt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLakitha Smith vs Danielle Scalfani6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCatherine Strickland vs Meredith Roberts6-4, 6-1
2025-02-09vs RommelmeyerWon 30
W#1 SinglesLarissa Malone vs Tracy Stephanski6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJessica Holleman vs Justine Chew6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLakitha Smith vs Kelli Dengate6-3, 6-2
2025-01-20vs Kimbrough/MussellWon 30
W#1 SinglesPatricia Furbay vs Isabelle Chammas3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJessica Holleman vs Emily Mussell6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLarissa Malone vs Chelsea Kimbrough6-4, 6-2
2025-01-11vs ParkerCFCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesPatricia Furbay vs Mabel Kitchin1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLakitha Smith vs Claire Foster Parker2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCarol Drennan vs Lily Murray6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Catherine Strickland
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.11
Patricia Furbay
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.08
Jessica Holleman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.86
Larissa Malone
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.73
Sara Fagel
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.72
Lakitha Smith
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.66
Carol Drennan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Sarah Brickels
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Strickland
36W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Patricia Furbay
54W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Jessica Holleman
33W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Larissa Malone
43W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sara Fagel
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Lakitha Smith
25W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Carol Drennan
29W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Sarah Brickels
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.