Teams

Je.Phillips40M

2025 Capital Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-25vs Je.Wolborsky40M3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Phillips / David Coman vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Marc Kaufman6-1, 6-0
2025-07-18vs Gr.Swank40MWon 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Kempf / Lorraine Hall vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez / Rahul Arora7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-11vs Ev.Fultz40MWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorraine Hall / David Coman vs Melissa Hill / Steve Crell4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Critcher / Howard Critcher vs Kevin Hampton / Amanda Campbell2-6, 3-6
2025-06-20vs Jo.VanCampen40MLost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Critcher / Howard Critcher vs Michell Wilson / John van Campen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-09vs Ev.Fultz40MLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Kempf / Elise Hamilton vs James McCown / Jennifer McCown3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHoward Critcher / Theresa Critcher vs Jeffrey Pollack / Liz Arcos3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-06vs Gr.Swank40MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLisa Kempf / Greg Kempf vs Gretchen Swank / Jason Swank4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Coman / Jessica Phillips vs Scott Walton / Diane Allen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-23vs Ap.Lyon40MLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Hill / Theresa Critcher vs Tim Lyon / April Bazin7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Lorraine Hall
published
3.69
Elise Hamilton
published
3.43
Howard Critcher
published
3.38
Lisa Kempf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lincoln Larson
published
3.11
David Coman
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.08
Greg Kempf
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Ronald Elliott
published
2.92
Theresa Critcher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kempf + Greg Kempf142545% games−9.0% vs expected
David Coman + Theresa Critcher7084% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorraine Hall
50W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.74
Elise Hamilton
37W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
Howard Critcher
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Lisa Kempf
365W–300L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Lincoln Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3
David Coman
87W–47L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Greg Kempf
45W–121L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Ronald Elliott
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Theresa Critcher
132W–78L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.