Teams

JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-01vs ROLLINGWOOD 40AW4.0AWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaurie Schofield / Staci Ross vs Laura Garrick / Laura Morales6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJennie Parker vs Michelle Strain0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Joachim / Pamela Russo vs Anita Cueto / Christina Vitale6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Follett / Denise Kimes vs Lynda Rose Purser / Angela Mabe6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
McKenzie Helvick
published
3.94
Jen Huang
published
3.91
Laurie Schofield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Teri Ostling
published
3.85
Laura O'Boyle
published
3.80
Terry Sandoval
published
3.79
Staci Ross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Lisa Fitzpatrick
published
Amie Elder
published 4
3.75
Kelly Follett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Lisa Miyashiro
published
3.72
Pamela Russo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Tami Thorson
published
3.69
Cheryl Meegan
published 4
3.68
Kathy Joachim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Jennie Parker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.66
Denise Kimes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Christine Hatch
published 4
3.41
Carrie Amick
published 3.5
Jennifer Schonhoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Joachim + Jennie Parker5452% games+6.6% vs expected
Staci Ross + Lisa Miyashiro4449% games+2.8% vs expected
Cheryl Meegan + Denise Kimes5352% gamesnot enough data
Teri Ostling + Laura O'Boyle3255% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Fitzpatrick + Cheryl Meegan224 matchesnot enough data
Teri Ostling + Christine Hatch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

McKenzie Helvick
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
Jen Huang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Laurie Schofield
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Teri Ostling
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Laura O'Boyle
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Terry Sandoval
19W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Staci Ross
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Lisa Fitzpatrick
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Amie Elder
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Follett
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Lisa Miyashiro
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Pamela Russo
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Tami Thorson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Cheryl Meegan
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Kathy Joachim
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jennie Parker
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Denise Kimes
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Christine Hatch
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Carrie Amick
28W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jennifer Schonhoff
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.