Teams

ROLLINGWOOD 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-16vs ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesErika Stone vs Angela Thompson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesErika Stone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesErika Stone vs Cynthia McPhee6-3, 6-1
2025-03-01vs JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.0ALost 13
L#1 DoublesLaura Garrick / Laura Morales vs Laurie Schofield / Staci Ross4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Strain vs Jennie Parker6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnita Cueto / Christina Vitale vs Kathy Joachim / Pamela Russo1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLynda Rose Purser / Angela Mabe vs Kelly Follett / Denise Kimes0-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs BROADSTONE RC 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesErika Stone vs Gayle Tanner6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-18vs GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Stone / Angela Mabe vs Irene Stafford / Amy Putty5-7, 1-6
2025-01-24vs ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Kelsey / Erika Stone vs Danielle Reading / Michelle Riley1-6, 0-6
2025-01-19vs BROADSTONE RC 40AW4.0BWon 10
W#1 DoublesErika Stone / Kim Kelsey vs Diana Sunseri / Karen Melton6-3, 7-6
2025-01-12vs RIO DEL ORO 40AW4.0BLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Ryan / Erika Stone vs Jessica Peers / April Larson4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Michelle Strain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.97
Lisa Ryan
published
3.81
Heidi Kurzenski
published
Angela Mabe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Erika Stone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.70
Stacy Whittingham
published
3.69
Laura Morales
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Kim Kelsey
published
3.64
Wanda Hasadsri
published
3.61
Laura Garrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Lisa Podlipnik
published
3.54
Teresa Jansson
published
3.52
Anita Cueto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lynda Rose Purser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Poppy Mussallem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ryan + Heidi Kurzenski2351% gamesnot enough data
Laura Garrick + Lynda Rose Purser033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Ryan + Stacy Whittingham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Strain
35W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Lisa Ryan
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Heidi Kurzenski
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Angela Mabe
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erika Stone
28W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Stacy Whittingham
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Laura Morales
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Kim Kelsey
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Wanda Hasadsri
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Laura Garrick
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lisa Podlipnik
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Teresa Jansson
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Anita Cueto
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Lynda Rose Purser
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Poppy Mussallem
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.