Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0A

2022 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-12vs PLEASANTON 55AW7.0BLost 01
L#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Kimberly Caison vs Barbara Brooks / Nancy Blom4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-05-25vs MORAGA CC 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesPamela Maloney / Lani Aurelius vs Susan Levy / Celeste Warner6-2, 6-1
2022-05-14vs INCLINE VILLAGE 55AW7.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Joanna Sienkiewicz vs Shelley Lober / Robyn Weiss6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-30vs LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Kimba Warford vs Cathy Lee / JoAnn Pawid6-4, 6-2
2022-04-15vs Walnut Creek TC 55AW7.0BLost 01
L#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Kathleen Pruden vs Mary Akli / Regina Hughes1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-07vs Bay Club Fremont 55AW7.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Flora Tang vs Cynthia James / Rose Keogh6-7, 4-6
2022-04-02vs PLEASANTON 55AW7.0BWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulieta Leong / Lani Aurelius vs Sheri Baldwin / Lynne Vuskovic6-2, 6-4
2022-03-27vs CROW CANYON CC 55AW7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Flora Tang vs Paula Bellas / Leda Lim6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Cherie Charbonneau vs Heidi Timken / Liz Nomura7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kimberly Caison
published
3.31
Kathleen Pruden
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.21
Stephanie Law
published
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
3.15
Pamela Maloney
published
3.10
Teri Frangie
published
2.99
Catherine Sampietro
published 3.5
2.88
Mary Kay Wilcock
published
Sally van Oosbree
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lani Aurelius + Tammie Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Caison
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Kathleen Pruden
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Stephanie Law
14W–26L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Pamela Maloney
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Catherine Sampietro
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Cherie Charbonneau
12W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
Mary Kay Wilcock
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally van Oosbree
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.