Teams

CHATA/Kathryn Willis

2024 CHATA Multi Level Combo - Spring · Combo Multi Level

18 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Combo Multi Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jill Kemp
published
3.69
Tricia Hammond
published
3.65
Julie Patton
published
3.61
Sharolette Rogers
published
3.42
3.42
Suzie Cook
published
3.27
Leslie Battle
published
3.25
Lauren Rodriguez
published
3.23
Paige Winters
published
2.85
Traviera Sewell
published
2.71
Jessica Livingston
published
2.64
Donna Jarzen
published 3
2.50
Lesley McInvale
published
2.38
Whitney Glisson
published
2.32
Ana Niknejad
published 2.5
2.25
Frances Wood
published 2.5
1.91
MacKenzie Rogers
published
Marcy Burgess
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traviera Sewell + Frances Wood4157% games+8.2% vs expected
Traviera Sewell + Lesley McInvale9361% games+6.7% vs expected
Donna Jarzen + Lauren Rodriguez314 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Cook + Leslie Battle404 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Cook + Jill Kemp404 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Pomeroy-Black + Leslie Battle134 matchesnot enough data
Lesley McInvale + Whitney Glisson224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Patton + Jill Kemp404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Kemp
28W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Tricia Hammond
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Julie Patton
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Sharolette Rogers
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Melinda Pomeroy-Black
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Suzie Cook
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.42
Leslie Battle
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Lauren Rodriguez
34W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Paige Winters
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Traviera Sewell
41W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jessica Livingston
16W–21L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Donna Jarzen
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.64
Lesley McInvale
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.50
Whitney Glisson
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.38
2.5
Ana Niknejad
23W–24L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Frances Wood
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
MacKenzie Rogers
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Marcy Burgess
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.