Teams

CC Monarch Deornellas 3.0W

2025 USTA CC Winter Adult 40 & OVER · CC USTA 3.0W 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-05vs CC Avila Power of Love 3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Ricedorff / Trish Ross vs Melbra King / CoAnn Weil3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBarbara Babka vs Marty Nitzberg6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Light / Pamela Hostetter vs Diane Farley / Jennifer Rainey6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-29vs CC-LLW-SMCC Line Kissers 3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeather Harper / Morri Nash vs Eileen Reinwald / Anne Lopez7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLynnly Sainsbury vs Ramona Cabiles1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTrish Ross / Karen Chubon vs Jo Lundberg / Lorena Torres0-6, 0-6
2025-03-23vs CC SLOCC Ricci 3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Chubon / Tracy Nelson vs Sandra Hedstrom / Kaaren Abbate4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Harper / Morri Nash vs Christina Slimack / Debra Hall6-3, 5-0
2025-03-16vs CC Avila Power of Love 3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Ricedorff / Trish Ross vs Cherie Charbonneau / Diane Farley6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMorri Nash vs Andrea Galvan7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Babka / Leslie Light vs CoAnn Weil / Marty Nitzberg7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-09vs CC-LLW-SMCC Line Kissers 3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Babka / Heather Harper vs Anne Lopez / Eileen Reinwald6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMorri Nash vs Kate JOHNSON2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Chubon / Trish Ross vs Kathleen Crain / Tammy Fulton6-4, 6-2
2025-02-27vs CC SLOCC Ricci 3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeather Harper / Pamela Hostetter vs Sandra Hedstrom / Kaaren Abbate6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLynnly Sainsbury vs Megan Humpal1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Babka / Karen Chubon vs Arianna Fasse / Melissa Allen6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-02-23vs CC-LLW-SMCC Line Kissers 3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Ricedorff / Morri Nash vs Martha Calderon / Jo Lundberg6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHeather Harper vs Lorena Torres3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Chubon / Tracy Nelson vs Kathleen Crain / Carmen Hernandez1-6, 4-6
2025-02-22vs CC Avila Power of Love 3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Harper / Pamela Hostetter vs Jeanette Gruidl / Cherie Charbonneau5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLynnly Sainsbury vs Marty Nitzberg3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMorri Nash / Sue Zweig vs Natasha Mercurio / Diane Farley4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-07vs CC SLOCC Ricci 3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Harper / Pamela Hostetter vs Christina Slimack / Debra Hall6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMorri Nash vs Sandra Hedstrom6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Light / Tracy Nelson vs Carlee Starkey / Arianna Fasse6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 3.0W 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Pamela Hostetter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Trish Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Heather Harper
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.94
Morri Nash
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.84
Barbara Babka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.65
Tracy Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Lynnly Sainsbury
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Janet Ricedorff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Chubon
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Leslie Light
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Deornellas
published
Sue Zweig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trish Ross + Heather Harper7361% games+3.5% vs expected
Morri Nash + Heather Harper3255% games−3.5% vs expected
Pamela Hostetter + Morri Nash5158% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Hostetter + Heather Harper213 matchesnot enough data
Morri Nash + Tracy Nelson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Hostetter
15W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Trish Ross
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Heather Harper
23W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Morri Nash
26W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Barbara Babka
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Tracy Nelson
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lynnly Sainsbury
9W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Janet Ricedorff
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Chubon
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Light
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Deornellas
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Zweig
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.