Teams

CC Avila Power of Love 3.0W

2025 USTA CC Winter Adult 40 & OVER · CC USTA 3.0W 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-06vs CC-LLW-SMCC Line Kissers 3.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelbra King / Natasha Mercurio vs Lorena Torres / Anne Lopez6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMarty Nitzberg vs Ramona Cabiles5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Kanako Nakajima vs Carmen Hernandez / Susan Pruett6-3, 6-3
2025-04-05vs CC Monarch Deornellas 3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelbra King / CoAnn Weil vs Janet Ricedorff / Trish Ross6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarty Nitzberg vs Barbara Babka0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Farley / Jennifer Rainey vs Leslie Light / Pamela Hostetter3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-16vs CC Monarch Deornellas 3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Marty Nitzberg vs Barbara Babka / Leslie Light6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-01vs CC-LLW-SMCC Line Kissers 3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesCherie Charbonneau / Jeanette Gruidl vs Susan Pruett / Eileen Reinwald5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarty Nitzberg vs Lorena Torres2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Diane Farley vs Kathleen Crain / Carmen Hernandez3-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs CC Monarch Deornellas 3.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeanette Gruidl / Cherie Charbonneau vs Heather Harper / Pamela Hostetter7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMarty Nitzberg vs Lynnly Sainsbury6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatasha Mercurio / Diane Farley vs Morri Nash / Sue Zweig6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-08vs CC-LLW-SMCC Line Kissers 3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesCherie Charbonneau / Jeanette Gruidl vs Carmen Hernandez / Ramona Cabiles6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStacy Inman vs Kate JOHNSON0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Farley / Jennifer Rainey vs Anne Lopez / Tammy Fulton7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 3.0W 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Kanako Nakajima
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Cherie Charbonneau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Melbra King
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
CoAnn Weil
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Jennifer Rainey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anita Stohr
published 3
2.67
Natasha Mercurio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Andrea Galvan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.58
Marty Nitzberg
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jeanette Gruidl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stacy Inman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CoAnn Weil + Kanako Nakajima8362% games+7.8% vs expected
Melbra King + Marty Nitzberg3541% games+4.2% vs expected
Andrea Galvan + Marty Nitzberg0637% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Charbonneau + Melbra King213 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Charbonneau + Jeanette Gruidl123 matchesnot enough data
CoAnn Weil + Marty Nitzberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kanako Nakajima
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Cherie Charbonneau
11W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Melbra King
14W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
CoAnn Weil
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Jennifer Rainey
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Anita Stohr
35W–46L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Natasha Mercurio
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Andrea Galvan
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Marty Nitzberg
20W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Jeanette Gruidl
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Inman
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.