Teams

SFV - Racketeers

2023 Adult 18+ SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-25vs SFV - Simply Smashing 3.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Haber vs Kate Gilbert2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Pradia / Ivonne Mendez vs Norma Jean / Vanessa Nelson3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Haber vs Mia Babilonia2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIvonne Mendez / Angie Pradia vs Julie Vlasak / Casey Hwang Martin0-6, 0-6
2023-06-11vs SFV - Rally GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Haber / Angie Pradia vs Bella Soroko / Cheryl Stolarski3-6, 4-6
2023-05-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJennifer Haber vs Lana Mril6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2023-05-13vs SFV - First StringLost 01
L#2 DoublesAngie Pradia / Jennifer Haber vs Ada Ramirez / Gabrielle Shrier7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-29vs SFV - Rally GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Haber / Rosine Simitian vs Deidre Hope / Carol Stevenson2-6, 1-6
2023-04-22vs SFV - Kiss my Ace - HTSBLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Johnson / Jennifer Haber vs Shannon Koeppen / Ellen Ratner3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
2.88
Martha Iveth Zarate
published
2.86
Jennifer Haber
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.74
Angie Pradia
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Letty King
published
2.70
Meegan Hamilton
published
2.66
Mary Coladonato
published
Liberty Peralta
published
Rosine Simitian
published
Yvonne Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Pradia + Jennifer Haber121451% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cholada Treepunprasert
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Martha Iveth Zarate
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Jennifer Haber
74W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Angie Pradia
47W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
Letty King
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Meegan Hamilton
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.70
Mary Coladonato
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Liberty Peralta
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rosine Simitian
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yvonne Brooks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.