Teams

SFV - First String

2023 Adult 18+ SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-03vs SFV - Kiss my Ace - HTSBWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmma Martinez / Nancy Pashayan vs Melissa Turai / Elizabeth Payne6-3, 7-6
2023-05-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNancy Pashayan vs Lana Mril5-7, 2-6
2023-05-13vs SFV - RacketeersWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebakah Amirkhizi / Juli Dershewitz vs Gladys Weiss / Cholada Treepunprasert6-2, 6-2
2023-04-30vs SFV - Simply Smashing 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesSara Herta / Nancy Pashayan vs Eliza Llobrera / Sandra Ackermann6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNancy Pashayan / Juli Dershewitz vs Andrea Epinger / Jo Ann Thrailkill3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Nancy Pashayan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Gabrielle Shrier
published
2.94
Sumi Im
published
2.89
Cindy Larson
published 3
2.85
Lourdes Duarte
published
2.81
Christine Chu
published 3
2.79
Juli Dershewitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
David Gillham
published 3
2.68
Diana Guevara
published 3
2.57
Ada Ramirez
published 2.5
2.48
Grace Gillham
published
Rocio Ibarra
published
Sara Herta
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Pashayan
61W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Gabrielle Shrier
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
Sumi Im
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Cindy Larson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lourdes Duarte
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Christine Chu
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Juli Dershewitz
62W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
David Gillham
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Diana Guevara
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Ada Ramirez
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%30%70%
2.57
Grace Gillham
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%57%43%
2.48
Rocio Ibarra
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Herta
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.