Teams

SoCal/Roehr/18&Over5.0F

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD

11 players · average NTRP 5.10 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Leire Martinez Barredo vs Barbara Mooney / Sheena Patel6-3, 6-2
2025-06-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Brittany Swenson vs Laina Matsuda / Grace Yao6-3, 7-5
2025-05-24vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ YaoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCassidy Ferrell / Claudia Roehr vs Jeyasri Venkatasubramani / Madalyn Moore6-2, 6-0
2025-05-17vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ PatelWon 10
W#1 SinglesJenna Boyhan vs Bethann Barry6-1, 6-3
2025-05-03vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ PatelWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Brittany Swenson vs Bettina Olah / Sheena Patel7-5, 6-4
2025-04-12vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ PatelWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Cassidy Ferrell vs Bethann Barry / Sheena Patel6-2, 6-0
2025-04-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesCassidy Ferrell / Claudia Roehr vs Vivian Lee / Grace Yao6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.23
Cassidy Ferrell
published 5.5
4.97
Deborah Lee-Tep
published 5
4.93
Sanem Ahearn
published
4.89
Claudia Roehr
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.89
Jami Jones
published
4.63
Jenna Boyhan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.57
Brittany Swenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Jana McCord
published
Sheila Rao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Roehr + Brittany Swenson10364% games+14.8% vs expected
Jenna Boyhan + Claudia Roehr7755% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Cassidy Ferrell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
5.23
5
Deborah Lee-Tep
14W–0L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.97
Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.93
5
Claudia Roehr
125W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.89
Jami Jones
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.89
5
Jenna Boyhan
70W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
5
Brittany Swenson
80W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.57
Jana McCord
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Perl Lancaster
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leire Martinez Barredo
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Rao
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.