Teams

SD 5.0 Miramar College/ Yao

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD

7 players · average NTRP 4.88 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-21vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ PatelWon 10
W#1 DoublesWileen Chiu / Madalyn Moore vs Lisa Crisafulli / Sheena Patel6-2, 6-2
2025-06-07vs SoCal/Roehr/18&Over5.0FLost 01
L#1 DoublesWileen Chiu / Madalyn Moore vs Deborah Lee-Tep / Jana McCord0-6, 1-6
2025-06-01vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ PatelWon 20
W#1 DoublesWileen Chiu / Grace Yao vs Shelby Rubin / Lucia Romanov7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaina Matsuda / Ifunanya Aniefuna vs Lisa Crisafulli / Kristie Alva7-5, 7-6
2025-05-24vs SoCal/Roehr/18&Over5.0FLost 01
L#2 DoublesWileen Chiu / Ana Seelinger vs Sanem Ahearn / Deborah Lee-Tep2-6, 1-6
2025-05-10vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ PatelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWileen Chiu / Jeyasri Venkatasubramani vs Bettina Olah / Sheena Patel4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIfunanya Aniefuna / Vivian Lee vs Shelby Rubin / Karyn McCartney2-6, 0-6
2025-04-26vs SoCal/Roehr/18&Over5.0FWon 10
W#1 DoublesWileen Chiu / Jeyasri Venkatasubramani vs Sanem Ahearn / Jami Jones3-6, 5-2
2025-04-19vs SD 5.0 Miramar College/ PatelWon 10
W#2 DoublesWileen Chiu / Grace Yao vs Lisa Crisafulli / Kristie Alva6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.75
Wileen Chiu
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.71
Grace Yao
published 5
4.63
Madalyn Moore
published
4.58
Priscilla Martinez
published
4.52
Ana Seelinger
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.42
Ifunanya Aniefuna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Yao + Wileen Chiu314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Wileen Chiu
38W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.75
5
Grace Yao
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.71
Madalyn Moore
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.63
Priscilla Martinez
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.58
5
Ana Seelinger
186W–59L career · 7 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.52
4.5
Ifunanya Aniefuna
31W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
Jeyasri Venkatasubramani
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.