Teams

LEBTC SILVER

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-22vs CCC BLUESplit 11
L#2 DoublesCarla Gamet / Elenita Marsan vs Katy Dunne / Rebecca Shefte2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Duque / Tami Nelson vs Kerry Barker / Lisa Banks7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-15vs CK REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesRebecca Duque / Lauren Tripp vs Heidi Mueller / Debra West5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElenita Marsan / Tami Nelson vs Lenora Louie Phelps / Denise van Essen2-6, 2-6
2023-06-01vs KC-RH GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarla Gamet / Rebecca Duque vs Jody Dart / Terri Jennings6-3, 7-6
2023-05-25vs BM BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesRebecca Duque / Sarah Phillips vs Carolyn Schilling / Emma Schilling3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarla Gamet / Elenita Marsan vs Deanna Deorio / Julie Pontiff6-7, 3-6
2023-05-18vs NJ GREENSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs Jennifer Bennett / Lisa Mountain4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesValerie Koenig / Elenita Marsan vs Lynn Dalton / Leslie Haines6-1, 6-2
2023-05-11vs NJ TEALWon 20
W#2 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs Jeanette Palizzi / Marcella Lucas6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJazmin Smith / Elenita Marsan vs Mandy Coughlin / Cynthia Adams6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Lauren Tripp
published
3.91
Rebecca Montgomery
published
3.89
Jazmin Smith
published
3.81
Rebecca Duque
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.78
Carla Gamet
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Elenita Marsan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Valerie Koenig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jazmin Smith + Rebecca Montgomery7163% games+6.1% vs expected
Rebecca Duque + Carla Gamet462853% games−1.1% vs expected
Elenita Marsan + Carla Gamet224 matchesnot enough data
Elenita Marsan + Valerie Koenig134 matchesnot enough data
Carla Gamet + Jazmin Smith404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Tripp
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
4.15
Rebecca Montgomery
20W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.91
Jazmin Smith
30W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Rebecca Duque
131W–117L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Carla Gamet
126W–86L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Elenita Marsan
67W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Valerie Koenig
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.