Teams

BM BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-22vs NJ GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesAree Bly / Deanna Deorio vs Leslie Haines / Eve Wall6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-06-15vs NJ TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesAree Bly / Sandy McGregor vs Jennifer Stiebeling / Yukiko Brooks4-6, 1-6
2023-06-08vs CCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesSandy McGregor / Julie Pontiff vs Kerri Luther / Tiernan McKay4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJenny Kelly / Casey Hemphill vs Gi Gi McShane / Lisa Banks7-5, 6-4
2023-06-01vs CK REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy McGregor / Jennifer Tucker vs Anita Burns / Denise van Essen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-25vs LEBTC SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenny Kelly / Casey Hemphill vs Jazmin Smith / Valerie Koenig6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeanna Deorio / Julie Pontiff vs Carla Gamet / Elenita Marsan7-6, 6-3
2023-05-18vs KC-RH GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesAree Bly / Sandy McGregor vs Debbie Lathrop / Diane Willoughby2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Aree Bly
published 4
3.76
Julie Pontiff
published
3.69
Jenny Kelly
published
3.65
3.64
Deanna Deorio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Sandy McGregor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Casey Hemphill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Emma Schilling
published
Lindsey Carpenter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Hemphill + Jenny Kelly5065% games+13.6% vs expected
Aree Bly + Sandy McGregor8650% games+2.7% vs expected
Sandy McGregor + Jenny Kelly2743% games+2.2% vs expected
Deanna Deorio + Julie Pontiff12853% games+1.0% vs expected
Casey Hemphill + Sandy McGregor5846% games−0.5% vs expected
Deanna Deorio + Casey Hemphill211453% games−1.2% vs expected
Carolyn Schilling + Jenny Kelly81544% games−1.8% vs expected
Carolyn Schilling + Sandy McGregor044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aree Bly
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Julie Pontiff
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Jenny Kelly
37W–39L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Carolyn Schilling
15W–33L career · type A · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Deanna Deorio
87W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Sandy McGregor
90W–147L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Casey Hemphill
64W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.58
Emma Schilling
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Carpenter
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.