Teams

High Point/Lane W8.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT W Monday · W8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-09vs Spring Park/Bradley W8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesLachrista Whatley / Michele Beach vs Renee Aaron / Natalie Clarkson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngelique Chan Mcdaniel / Amy Farrell vs Pamela Agathon / MARY DAMKROGER6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDoreen Thomas / Katheryn Ross vs Stacey Zartler / Julie Bradley6-1, 6-4
2026-03-02vs High Point/Trousil W8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Farrell / Lachrista Whatley vs Jannine Soldan / Jackie Zarate6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCaryn Dula / Theresa Lane vs Donna Heffernan / Stefanie Wacker6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Chapman / Suzanne Kim vs Lynda Butcher / Anne Dragisic5-7, 0-6
2026-02-23vs Greenhill/Nevelow W8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Farrell / Lachrista Whatley vs Jean McAulay / Ann Schober6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Lane / Katheryn Ross vs Kimberly Grogan / Elizabeth Nevelow6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShannon Craig / Doreen Thomas vs Monique Black / Judy Barbo2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-16vs High Point/Dwiggins W8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesTheresa Lane / Katheryn Ross vs Jill Nail / Stacy Revely6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShannon Craig / Angelique Chan Mcdaniel vs Deanna Williams / Karen Adams6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Kim / Doreen Thomas vs Toni Harrigan / Betty Evans6-1, 6-3
2026-02-09vs Greenhill/Perron-Hassamer W8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLachrista Whatley / Michele Beach vs Lynn Mangus / Andrea Taylor7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDoreen Thomas / Michelle McGuire vs Marnie Pizzitola / Edith Kruckmann5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Farrell / Angelique Chan Mcdaniel vs Eugenia Viejobueno / Julie Smith2-6, 4-6
2026-02-06vs High Point/Carr-Van Ausdall W8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Beach / Katheryn Ross vs Maria Caldwell / Christine Keith5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Chapman / Lachrista Whatley vs Diana Carr / Lauren Cain7-6, 7-5
2026-02-03vs Brookhaven/Murphy-Ward W8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Beach / Lachrista Whatley vs Cecy Feld / Kathy Engelbrecht4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle McGuire / Katheryn Ross vs Jackie Reily / Hope Heldmar6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesAmy Farrell / Lachrista Whatley vs Wendy Blackwell / Christine Fimbres6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Kim / Doreen Thomas vs Cathy Dawson / Lisa Thomas2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · W8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point/Carr-Van Ausdall W8.08018617171
2Greenhill/Nevelow W8.06217723220
3Greenhill/Perron-Hassamer W8.05316818169
4High Point/Lane W8.053141022201
5Brookhaven/Murphy-Ward W8.035111328215
6High Point/Trousil W8.035121229222
7Spring Park/Bradley W8.035101430230
8Canyon Creek/Kramer-Cormier Reeder W8.03581636249
9High Point/Dwiggins W8.00822245273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Michele Beach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Katheryn Ross
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Lachrista Whatley
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.75
Angelique Chan Mcdaniel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Caryn Dula
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Michelle McGuire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Shannon Craig
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.55
Doreen Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Suzanne Kim
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Emily Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacqueline Jenkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lachrista Whatley + Michele Beach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Beach
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Katheryn Ross
18W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
Lachrista Whatley
24W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Angelique Chan Mcdaniel
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Caryn Dula
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michelle McGuire
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Shannon Craig
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Doreen Thomas
9W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Suzanne Kim
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.42
Emily Chapman
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.17
Jacqueline Jenkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.