Teams

Spring Park/Bradley W8.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT W Monday · W8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-09vs High Point/Lane W8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Aaron / Natalie Clarkson vs Lachrista Whatley / Michele Beach2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Agathon / MARY DAMKROGER vs Angelique Chan Mcdaniel / Amy Farrell3-6, 6-7
2026-02-23vs High Point/Trousil W8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRenee Aaron / Jennifer Young vs Libby Hartter / Jannine Soldan1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristl Pearl / Michelle Hefner vs Lynda Butcher / Jackie Zarate0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly DiNota / Teri Wilson vs Deborah Becker / Anne Dragisic0-6, 3-6
2026-02-16vs Greenhill/Nevelow W8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Aaron / Natalie Clarkson vs Patricia Arvanitis / Suzanne Ortolano7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichelle Hefner / Kristl Pearl vs Karen Newby / Sandy Seaton6-4, 6-2
2026-02-11vs High Point/Carr-Van Ausdall W8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Clarkson / Bonnie Shea vs Kristen Aragon / Maria Caldwell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Aaron / Jennifer Young vs Christine Keith / Katie Tran3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristl Pearl / Michelle Hefner vs Diana Carr / Lauren Cain6-4, 6-4
2026-02-09vs High Point/Dwiggins W8.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Young / Michelle Hefner vs Stephanie Pfleghaar / Stacy Revely7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBonnie Shea / Kristl Pearl vs Betty Evans / Karen Adams2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMARY DAMKROGER / Kimberly DiNota vs Mary Dwiggins / Toni Harrigan6-1, 6-0
2026-02-02vs Greenhill/Perron-Hassamer W8.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesStacey Zartler / Pamela Agathon vs Andrea Taylor / Lynn Mangus1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRenee Aaron / Jennifer Young vs Eugenia Viejobueno / Heather Vik6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Hefner / Kristl Pearl vs Jody Hassemer / Joanie Buster4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-19vs Brookhaven/Murphy-Ward W8.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Aaron / Natalie Clarkson vs Jackie Reily / Kathy Engelbrecht6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hefner / Kristl Pearl vs Renee Haygood / Linda Bowers5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Hefner / Jennifer Young vs Kim Olds / Lisa Thomas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Bradley / Renee Aaron vs Monica Pappas / Tara Cormier-Reeder6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Shea / Kristl Pearl vs Christine Fimbres / Dawn Ritz7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · W8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1High Point/Carr-Van Ausdall W8.08018617171
2Greenhill/Nevelow W8.06217723220
3Greenhill/Perron-Hassamer W8.05316818169
4High Point/Lane W8.053141022201
5Brookhaven/Murphy-Ward W8.035111328215
6High Point/Trousil W8.035121229222
7Spring Park/Bradley W8.035101430230
8Canyon Creek/Kramer-Cormier Reeder W8.03581636249
9High Point/Dwiggins W8.00822245273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Natalie Clarkson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Renee Aaron
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.69
Bonnie Shea
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kristl Pearl
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.62
Teri Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
MARY DAMKROGER
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.57
Michelle Hefner
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.53
Stacey Zartler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Kimberly DiNota
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Agathon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Wilson + Stacey Zartler17368% games+5.9% vs expected
Kimberly DiNota + MARY DAMKROGER7359% games+0.3% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Kristl Pearl7354% games−1.2% vs expected
Teri Wilson + Kimberly DiNota3244% gamesnot enough data
Renee Aaron + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hefner + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + Bonnie Shea123 matchesnot enough data
Teri Wilson + MARY DAMKROGER303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Clarkson
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
Renee Aaron
48W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Bonnie Shea
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.69
Kristl Pearl
17W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Teri Wilson
43W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.62
MARY DAMKROGER
40W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Michelle Hefner
30W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Stacey Zartler
26W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Kimberly DiNota
32W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Pamela Agathon
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.