Teams

Udaho

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 9.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women 9.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Udaho000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Heather Silverman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Jane McQuade
published 4.5
4.05
Sue Curtis
published
4.00
Tracey Valentine
published
3.61
3.58
Melanie Smith
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Hanna Bigelow
published
Renee Schart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane McQuade + Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury10749% games−3.5% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Sue Curtis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Silverman
82W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Jane McQuade
266W–179L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
4.11
Sue Curtis
49W–49L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
Tracey Valentine
95W–60L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Christie Brightwell
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
77W–136L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
Melanie Smith
29W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.58
Hanna Bigelow
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Schart
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.