Teams

Village Walk Bonita - Macwilliams

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-15vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Claire Ehrhardt vs Lesley Kranites / Siobhan Powell6-1, 6-1
2023-03-08vs Naples Grande - BrownLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Ravens / Kristine Bergenheim vs Marie Veintimilla / Aimee Hummel0-6, 5-7
2023-03-01vs Pelican Bay North - HowardLost 01
L#3 DoublesClaire Ehrhardt / Ann Hathaway vs Michelle Bammel / Susan Fasig2-6, 0-6
2023-02-22vs Quail West - DavisWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Katherine MacWilliams vs Aster Leitner / Karen Romine6-3, 6-3
2023-02-01vs Mediterra - VaccariLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Marcia Erpenbeck vs Lisa Dailey / Rebecca Matarazzi2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-01-25vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Ann Kremer vs Gabriela Chahwan / Patricia Gill6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKristine Bergenheim / Connie Mosbaugh vs Renee Facciola / Ricki Giersch3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarcia Erpenbeck / Claire Ehrhardt vs Dana Sacks / Lisa Campbell1-6, 6-7
2023-01-11vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 01
L#1 DoublesConnie Mosbaugh / Claire Ehrhardt vs Cheryl Rauch / Rosemary Rolak5-7, 2-6
2023-01-04vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Kremer / Claire Ehrhardt vs Dawn DeDomenico / Ellen Evans2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
3.27
Ann Kremer
published 3.5
Ann Hathaway
published 3.5
3.21
Margaret Laggis
published
3.17
Kristine Bergenheim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Marcia Erpenbeck
published
3.01
Leslie Prinz
published
2.75
Claire Ehrhardt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Joan Ravens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Ravens + Ann Kremer2349% gamesnot enough data
Claire Ehrhardt + Kristine Bergenheim3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine MacWilliams
32W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Ann Kremer
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ann Hathaway
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Laggis
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristine Bergenheim
38W–52L career · 6 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Marcia Erpenbeck
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Leslie Prinz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Claire Ehrhardt
18W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
Joan Ravens
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.