Teams

Quail West - Davis

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-03-15vs Pelican Bay North - HowardWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Kim Swope Schott vs Amy Enxing / Dawn Cyr6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Romine / Katrina Tiedge vs Michelle Bammel / Susan Fasig3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBehnoosh Behmaram / Shirley Yagoda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-01vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPam Davis / Natalie Cortese vs Mia Delk / Bridget Smagala6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBehnoosh Behmaram / Shirley Yagoda vs Lori Ceryak / Corey Stranger3-2
2023-02-22vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Mary Huber-Olk vs Marcia Erpenbeck / Jennifer Reichel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-15vs Mediterra - VaccariLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Mary Huber-Olk vs Lisa Dailey / Kimberly Mazziotti6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Candy Brunton1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Suzie Crews vs Stephanie Bauer / Maureen Rennie2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-02-08vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Natalie Cortese vs Julie Lenhart / Sharon Sturges2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Tiffany Moncrieff4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-01vs COLLIER / D. Bursch/ 40&over3.5AdultSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJane Mills / Kim Swope Schott vs Susan Julich / Shirley Steffen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Romine / Shirley Yagoda vs Julie Kastholm / Renee Facciola0-6, 2-6
2023-01-25vs Olde Cypress - LoomisWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Katrina Tiedge vs Susan Reedy / Rosemary Rolak7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Kim Swope Schott vs Kelly Deufel / Flora Loomis3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-18vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Kim Swope Schott vs Linda Koenig / Patty McClimans6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesShirley Yagoda / Suzie Crews vs Beth McKay / Elaine Morrison7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2023-01-11vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineLost 13
L#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Kim Swope Schott vs Cyndee Verhelle / Sonja Pound1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Meghan Kellam1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Aster Leitner vs Maria Lafontaine / Laraine Segar2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBehnoosh Behmaram / Shirley Yagoda vs Lisa Byanski / Siobhan Powell7-6, 6-3
2023-01-04vs Naples Grande - BrownWon 21
W#1 DoublesColleen Bresson / Mary Huber-Olk vs Sandra Frost / Leticia Lancsarics6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJane Mills vs Cecilia Trinh6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Pam Davis vs Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Nikki Miller0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Suzie Crews
published
3.39
Colleen Bresson
published 3.5
3.32
Michelle Minor
published
3.23
Karen Romine
published
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Leslie Boris
published
3.16
Aster Leitner
published 3.5
3.13
Behnoosh Behmaram
published 3.5
3.11
Pam Davis
published
3.06
Kim Swope Schott
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.89
Shirley Yagoda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 3
Katrina Tiedge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Huber-Olk + Colleen Bresson11363% games+8.9% vs expected
Katrina Tiedge + Mary Huber-Olk4261% gamesnot enough data
Kim Swope Schott + Katrina Tiedge213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Swope Schott + Mary Huber-Olk213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Suzie Crews
18W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Colleen Bresson
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Michelle Minor
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Karen Romine
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Leslie Boris
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Aster Leitner
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Behnoosh Behmaram
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kim Swope Schott
23W–28L career · 7 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Shirley Yagoda
155W–105L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Katrina Tiedge
45W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.