Teams

PKartes (Mountainbrook)

2022-2023 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 9.0 Men; Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-01-19vs RPietrykowski (PPRSC) BRiCKLost 01
L#1 DoublesLee Baldwin / Patrick Kartes vs Kent Franks / Rich Pietrykowski4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-01-18vs BHood (Blakeney) The DisruptorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Rudy Bombien vs Bradford Hood / Chirag Dua6-1, 6-3
2023-01-03vs JMoon (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Tai Kam vs Jihun Moon / Rajesh Sankaran3-6, 2-6
2022-12-18vs SHickey (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLee Baldwin / Tai Kam vs Sean Hickey / John Semones4-6, 1-6
2022-12-13vs RMeijer (BCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Rudy Bombien vs Kevin Sferro / Stephan Custer6-2, 7-6
2022-11-30vs MBaum (Queens) Ace, Ace BabyLost 01
L#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Kartes vs Matthew Baum / Pete Eakin2-6, 2-6
2022-11-21vs ARoss (PPRSC) KATZWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Tai Kam vs Dan Zakerski / Tim Hausmann6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-07vs RWilkes (PPRSC) We R GReAT@PPRSCLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Lee Baldwin vs Glenn Wrisley / Alven Weil6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-11-03vs CGluff (Palisades) TugboatsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Tai Kam vs Jeff Burrell / David Matters5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Men; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Rudy Bombien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Patrick Kartes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Tai Kam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lee Baldwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rudy Bombien + Patrick Kartes231155% games−2.3% vs expected
Patrick Kartes + Tai Kam2343% gamesnot enough data
Rudy Bombien + Tai Kam123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rudy Bombien
86W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Patrick Kartes
103W–52L career · 8 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Tai Kam
40W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Lee Baldwin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.