Teams

SKY BLUE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-03vs VC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesErika Sabatos / Emily Brown vs Shannon Kasperbauer / Kate Reinemund6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKatie Garrison vs Betsy Bengtson1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKim Brummond / Kim Foster vs Andrea Barry Johnson / Janney Carpenter6-4, 7-5
2026-08-27vs EM REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Foster / Joy Kathleen Murphy vs Ashley Wolfe / Michele Olree6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-24vs HV YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler vs Libby Palmer / Morgen Calgaard6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesErika Sabatos vs Piper Vitale1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKim Brummond / Katie Garrison vs Brooke Burdic / Grace Cadorette2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-06vs GCC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Gloeckler / Katie Garrison vs Allison Kaelberer / Breanna Hunt6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-05vs CHCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoy Kathleen Murphy / Emily Brown vs Kelsey Cullen / Ann Marie Johnson4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Gloeckler vs Meredith Calkins1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Foster / Kim Brummond vs Julianna Dixon / Niki Goldberg3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kelly Gloeckler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kim Foster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Erika Sabatos
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Katie Garrison
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Kim Brummond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Joy Kathleen Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Kathleen Murphy + Erika Sabatos6355% games+11.0% vs expected
Kim Foster + Erika Sabatos4250% games+6.1% vs expected
Kim Foster + Joy Kathleen Murphy2348% games−0.9% vs expected
Kim Brummond + Joy Kathleen Murphy3844% games−3.0% vs expected
Kim Brummond + Kim Foster3348% games−5.0% vs expected
Erika Sabatos + Kelly Gloeckler4162% gamesnot enough data
Kim Brummond + Katie Garrison224 matchesnot enough data
Joy Kathleen Murphy + Katie Garrison134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kelly Gloeckler
63W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Kim Foster
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Erika Sabatos
105W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Katie Garrison
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Kim Brummond
87W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Joy Kathleen Murphy
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.