Teams

HV YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-24vs SKY BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesLibby Palmer / Morgen Calgaard vs Emily Brown / Kelly Gloeckler2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPiper Vitale vs Erika Sabatos6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Burdic / Grace Cadorette vs Kim Brummond / Katie Garrison2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-20vs CHCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLibby Palmer / TRACY DUHIG vs Kelly Koch / Stacey Knox1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAshley Larson vs Maggie Dornseif3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Mehringer / Ann Mann vs Kelsey Cullen / Kim Addlesperger7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2026-08-06vs VC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Mehringer / Ann Mann vs Janney Carpenter / Lindsay Needler-Turner2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEmily Muellenberg vs Betsy Bengtson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Burdic / Mackenzie Fair vs Meghan Baker / Amy McDevitt1-6, 3-6
2026-08-01vs EM REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesTRACY DUHIG / Sue Smith vs Ashley Wolfe / Michele Olree2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMorgen Calgaard vs Tammy Terhaar0-6, 2-6
2026-07-23vs ATC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Muellenberg / Ashley Larson vs Tami Beardsley / Ashley Peterson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJeannie Lindley vs Martha Solis-Turner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMackenzie Fair / Grace Cadorette vs Jackie Brown-Griggs / Sarah Soane3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Piper Vitale
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Morgen Calgaard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
TRACY DUHIG
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Jeannie Lindley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Theresa Mehringer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Grace Cadorette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Libby Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Ashley Larson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Emily Muellenberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Brooke Burdic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Mackenzie Fair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Parnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgen Calgaard + Libby Palmer102446% games+1.2% vs expected
Libby Palmer + TRACY DUHIG3347% games−1.0% vs expected
Brooke Burdic + Emily Muellenberg2435% games−5.9% vs expected
Piper Vitale + Morgen Calgaard1441% gamesnot enough data
Grace Cadorette + Theresa Mehringer314 matchesnot enough data
Grace Cadorette + Brooke Burdic123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Piper Vitale
39W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Morgen Calgaard
29W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
TRACY DUHIG
16W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Jeannie Lindley
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Theresa Mehringer
17W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Grace Cadorette
4W–11L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
Libby Palmer
17W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Ashley Larson
10W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Emily Muellenberg
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Brooke Burdic
29W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Mackenzie Fair
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.75
Rebecca Parnell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.