Teams

LATA55/BOWENS/SSP

2026 Combo 55 & Over - STA · Adult Women - 6.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.22 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Jackie Belcher-Cook
published 3.5
3.25
Joann Brennan
published
3.20
Lisa Bronson
published
3.16
Michelle Willm
published
3.12
Haideline Sosa
published 3.5
3.11
Janet Boatwright
published
3.09
Melvie Harris
published
3.04
Colette Callender
published 3.5
3.00
Vivian Wych
published
2.94
Barbara Bowens
published 3.5
2.91
Diane Junis
published 3
2.90
Adrienne Wright
published 3
2.84
Tracie Ifkovits
published
2.80
Shirley Schoonover
published
2.75
Kristen Sojourner
published
2.67
Gail Jabber
published 3
2.67
Deborah Poston
published 3
2.54
Katherine Taylor
published
2.50
Batina Feaster
published 3
Rhonda Alexander
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melvie Harris + Joann Brennan121054% games+3.4% vs expected
Jackie Belcher-Cook + Joann Brennan8847% games+3.0% vs expected
Lisa Bronson + Melvie Harris4552% games+0.4% vs expected
Joann Brennan + Rhonda Alexander2349% games−1.9% vs expected
Jackie Belcher-Cook + Barbara Bowens2646% games−3.7% vs expected
Melvie Harris + Colette Callender41141% games−4.9% vs expected
Colette Callender + Janet Boatwright2544% games−5.7% vs expected
Jackie Belcher-Cook + Colette Callender2842% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jackie Belcher-Cook
70W–74L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Joann Brennan
166W–116L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
Lisa Bronson
61W–45L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Michelle Willm
65W–84L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Haideline Sosa
186W–75L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
Janet Boatwright
32W–22L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Melvie Harris
47W–80L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Colette Callender
47W–80L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Vivian Wych
119W–92L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Barbara Bowens
34W–85L career · type A · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Diane Junis
101W–86L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Adrienne Wright
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Tracie Ifkovits
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Shirley Schoonover
137W–112L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Kristen Sojourner
33W–39L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Gail Jabber
62W–66L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Deborah Poston
18W–22L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.67
Katherine Taylor
3W–19L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Batina Feaster
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.50
Rhonda Alexander
72W–94L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.