Teams

LATA40/SMITH/CTFC

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5 - Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Teri Colden
published
3.12
Haideline Sosa
published 3.5
3.11
Janet Boatwright
published
3.05
Michiko Johnson
published
2.93
Nancie Shillington-Perez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Lauren Lamey
published
2.86
Jayne Woodward
published
2.85
Janet Sullivan
published
2.79
Fanni Simmons
published 3
2.76
Felecia Brown
published 3
2.69
Peggy Dingle
published
2.60
KIM EDWARDS
published
2.48
Emi Ohta
published 3
Julie Murphy
published
Mary Blevins
published
Michelle Mueckler
published
Pat Smith
published
Teresa Ziegler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayne Woodward + Janet Boatwright12558% games+8.8% vs expected
Teresa Ziegler + Haideline Sosa581467% games+6.6% vs expected
Felecia Brown + Michiko Johnson4548% games+3.3% vs expected
Michelle Mueckler + Julie Murphy2643% games−0.5% vs expected
Fanni Simmons + Felecia Brown4747% games−2.3% vs expected
Peggy Dingle + Michiko Johnson1434% games−13.0% vs expected
KIM EDWARDS + Lauren Lamey2343% gamesnot enough data
Fanni Simmons + Peggy Dingle404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Colden
43W–64L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Haideline Sosa
186W–75L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
Janet Boatwright
32W–22L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Michiko Johnson
37W–57L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Nancie Shillington-Perez
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Lauren Lamey
64W–76L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Jayne Woodward
32W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Janet Sullivan
84W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Fanni Simmons
43W–39L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Felecia Brown
27W–56L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
Peggy Dingle
39W–82L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
KIM EDWARDS
25W–37L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Emi Ohta
29W–76L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Julie Murphy
30W–76L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Blevins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Mueckler
45W–82L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pat Smith
8W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Ziegler
104W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.