Teams

BBTC - Dawkins

2025 Adult 18 & Over-GC · Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-21vs BBTC - JuraszekLost 23
W#1 DoublesCathy Saunier / Tamara Moody vs Shelly Williams / Regan Foster6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGloria Doty vs Tana Cooper2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTrinity Henn / Missy Descher vs Amanda Letonoff / April Mechatto4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJackie Orgler vs Hollie Miller2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCory Brainard / Kathryn Plott vs Julie Bradley / Allison Ward1-6, 6-7
2025-04-10vs Biloxi - FoleyLost 05
L#1 DoublesTrinity Henn / Audry Bush vs Michelle Foley / Lisa Mabry Smith6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJackie Orgler vs Karah Brown2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Plott / Cory Brainard vs Dianne Holloway / Mary Ann Strickland4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSamantha Mitchell vs Lynsie Battles6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Benigno / Kathleen Fitzgerald vs Danna Day / Nicole Montagnet0-6, 2-6
2025-03-24vs Biloxi - FoleyLost 05
L#1 DoublesMissy Descher / Rebecca Mayfield vs Jane Ardito / Lynette Cooper3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGloria Doty vs Andrea May4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Plott / Linda Benigno vs Danna Day / Julie West5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKathleen Fitzgerald vs Kelsey Martin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Orgler / Samantha Mitchell vs Michelle Foley / Lynsie Battles1-6, 0-6
2025-03-06vs BBTC - JuraszekLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Mayfield / Cathy Saunier vs Angie Simmons / Julie Bradley3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCory Brainard / Kathryn Plott vs Ellen Taylor / Allison Ward4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Fitzgerald / Samantha Mitchell vs Carly Nichols Coy / Shelly Williams1-6, 1-6
2025-02-24vs Biloxi - FoleyLost 04
L#1 DoublesMissy Descher / Tamara Moody vs Lynette Cooper / Dianne Holloway3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Mayfield vs Andrea May2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaulette Dawkins / Audry Bush vs Danna Day / Julie West1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Benigno / Kathleen Fitzgerald vs Jane Ardito / Laura Marcel5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Cory Brainard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Cathy Saunier
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Jackie Orgler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Linda Benigno
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.44
Audry Bush
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Missy Descher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Trinity Henn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Gloria Doty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Rebecca Mayfield
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.11
Tamara Moody
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Paulette Dawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Samantha Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.98
Kathleen Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Kathryn Plott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audry Bush + Rebecca Mayfield10658% games+9.3% vs expected
Cathy Saunier + Rebecca Mayfield5354% games+4.4% vs expected
Paulette Dawkins + Kathleen Fitzgerald2640% games−5.1% vs expected
Tamara Moody + Audry Bush3442% games−9.1% vs expected
Cory Brainard + Rebecca Mayfield134 matchesnot enough data
Audry Bush + Linda Benigno404 matchesnot enough data
Audry Bush + Kathleen Fitzgerald314 matchesnot enough data
Audry Bush + Samantha Mitchell134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cory Brainard
22W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cathy Saunier
40W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Jackie Orgler
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Linda Benigno
73W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Audry Bush
59W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Missy Descher
12W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Trinity Henn
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
3.5
Gloria Doty
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Rebecca Mayfield
70W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Tamara Moody
50W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Paulette Dawkins
40W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Samantha Mitchell
25W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Kathleen Fitzgerald
24W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Kathryn Plott
31W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.