Teams

A5 ACAC Lewis

2024 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-07vs A7 ACAC Estes MastinWon 20
W#2 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Charmaine Nerone7-5, 5-4
W#3 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Anna Holloway6-0, 6-1
2024-11-02vs A3 Sherdel BelmontWon 10
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Stacy Sherdel6-1, 6-1
2024-10-24vs A2 Avalon - MasonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Faith Kallman6-2, 4-5
L#2 SinglesSandra Holahan vs Sarah Hobgood2-6, 2-6
2024-10-17vs A1 Salisbury WeisigerWon 20
W#2 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Mary Knick7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Laura Haskin6-1, 6-1
2024-10-10vs A8 Raintree GromlingWon 20
W#1 SinglesNatalie Lewis vs Rashelle Hayes7-6, 5-2
W#2 SinglesSandra Holahan vs Ashley Gromling7-5, 6-3
2024-10-03vs A6 Westwood BurkeLost 02
L#1 SinglesMartinique Kandl vs Emma Moredock4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Coleman vs Kacie Painter3-6, 4-6
2024-09-26vs A4 Herm NicholsWon 10
W#3 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Thu-Hang Groome6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Katy Bassler0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Grace Kim
published
3.43
Martinique Kandl
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Rose Bennett
published
3.31
Denise Weisberg
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Anne Townsend
published 3.5
3.23
Anne Saunier
published 3.5
3.21
Elizabeth Coleman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Natalie Lewis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Sandra Holahan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grace Kim
22W–26L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Martinique Kandl
166W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Rose Bennett
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Denise Weisberg
174W–160L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Anne Townsend
32W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Anne Saunier
20W–28L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Elizabeth Coleman
171W–119L career · 1 line in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Sandra Holahan
59W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.